...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >From cottage industry to post-industrial care? The RCGP response to the King's Fund report on the quality of care in general practice
【24h】

From cottage industry to post-industrial care? The RCGP response to the King's Fund report on the quality of care in general practice

机译:从家庭手工业到后工业护理? RCGP对国王基金关于一般医疗质量的报告的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION-'Most of the care provided by general practice is good ... however, there are variations in performance and some quality gaps which need to be addressed...'With these words, the King's Fund report sets out the challenge for general practice in the 21st century. This report is a product of an independent inquiry and represents the most extensive examination of quality in general practice for many years.In his foreword, Sir Ian Kennedy describes general practice as 'not given to self-reflection and self-challenge'. Little evidence is provided for this contention. General practice has been at the forefront of the profession in promoting reflective practice as part of its specialist training programmes. General practice was an early adopter of clinical audit and significant event analysis to improve clinical care. Not for the first time, preconceived ideas about general practice have run ahead of the evidence, and such assertions should not go unchallenged!
机译:引言-'普通医生提供的大多数照护服务都很好...但是,绩效存在差异,需要解决一些质量差距...'在21世纪的实践。该报告是独立调查的产物,代表了多年来对通用实践质量的最广泛审查。伊恩·肯尼迪爵士在序言中将通用实践描述为``不给予自我反省和自我挑战''。很少有证据可以证明这一观点。作为专业培训计划的一部分,一般实践一直在促进反思实践方面处于行业的最前沿。一般实践是临床审计和重大事件分析的早期采用者,以改善临床护理。这不是第一次,关于通用实践的先入为主的观念先于证据,这种主张不应该受到挑战!

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号