【24h】

Integration of care

机译:综合护理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Trish Greenhalgh asks why Cochrane reviews are so boring.1 Strange that she should ask such a question on this particular platform. Many colleagues ask me the same question about the BJGP[identified as I am as the local RCGP stooge because of my varied faculty activities during the course of my career). My answer in both contexts is the same: of course they are boring to practitioners because the job of practitioners is (no surprises) to practice. Both Cochrane reviews and the research articles appearing in the BJGP, nevertheless, are essential to the progress of practical medicine. We turn to them when we need them.
机译:Trish Greenhalgh问为什么Cochrane评论这么无聊。1奇怪,她应该在这个特定平台上问这样的问题。许多同事问我有关BJGP的相同问题(由于我在职业生涯中从事各种各样的教职活动,因此被称为本地RCGP笨蛋)。在这两种情况下,我的回答是相同的:它们对从业者很无聊,因为从业者的工作是(毫无意外)要实践的。尽管如此,BJGP中出现的Cochrane评论和研究文章对实用医学的进步都是必不可少的。我们在需要时会求助于他们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号