...
首页> 外文期刊>The heart surgery forum >Comparison of remifentanil and low-dose fentanyl for fast-track cardiac anesthesia: A prospective randomized study
【24h】

Comparison of remifentanil and low-dose fentanyl for fast-track cardiac anesthesia: A prospective randomized study

机译:瑞芬太尼和小剂量芬太尼用于快速心脏麻醉的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Different anesthetic techniques have been used for fast tracking in cardiac anesthesia. Remifentanil, with its unique pharmacokinetic profile, could be an ideal drug for fast tracking. Possible limitations of remifentanil are rapid onset of postoperative pain after discontinuation of the drug infusion, which may increase the risk of an ischemic event. We conducted this randomized study to compare the efficacy of remifentanil versus low doses of fentanyl in fast-track cardiac anesthesia. It has been hypothesized that remifentanil would provide a safe anesthesia with no impact on myocardial function and with positive effects on extubation time and mobilization. Methods: We compared the postoperative course of patients, the remifentanil group (RG) and the low-dose fentanyl group (LDFG), in whom remifentanil and low-dose fentanyl, respectively, were used for fast-track cardiac anesthesia. The study was designed as a prospective randomized study. The primary outcomes were changes in the cardiac index and creatine kinase MB fraction (CKMB), extubation times, mobilization times, and lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the hospital. Frequency of myocardial infarction (MI), reoperations due to excessive bleeding, renal impairment, and cerebral complications were registered as well. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled in the study, and 7 were excluded due to difficult airway, bleeding, and technical difficulties. The RG comprised 33 patients and the LDFG comprised of 31 patients. There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, Euroscore, types of surgery, extracorporeal circulation, and aortic cross-clamp time. We did not find significant difference in cardiac index, CKMB, extubation times, mobilization times, length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital between the groups. Postoperative complications such as MI, rates of reoperations, renal and cerebral complications and incidence of atrial fibrillation did not show any significant differences. Conclusions: Remifentanil fast-track anesthesia for cardiac patients has no negative impact on myocardial function. Both remifentanil and low-dose fentanyl are equally effective and safe for fast-track cardiac anesthesia. The study did not highlight any statistical superiority of remifentanil anesthesia over low-dose fentanyl anesthesia.
机译:背景:不同的麻醉技术已被用于心脏麻醉的快速跟踪。瑞芬太尼具有独特的药代动力学特征,可能是快速追踪的理想药物。瑞芬太尼可能的局限性是停药后术后疼痛迅速发作,这可能增加缺血事件的风险。我们进行了这项随机研究,以比较瑞芬太尼与低剂量芬太尼在快速心脏麻醉中的疗效。假设瑞芬太尼将提供一种安全的麻醉方法,对心肌功能没有影响,并且对拔管时间和动员有积极作用。方法:我们比较了患者的术后病程,分别使用瑞芬太尼和低剂量芬太尼进行快速心脏麻醉的瑞芬太尼组(RG)和低剂量芬太尼组(LDFG)。该研究被设计为前瞻性随机研究。主要结果是心脏指数和肌酸激酶MB分数(CKMB),拔管时间,动员时间以及在重症监护病房(ICU)和医院的住院时间的变化。还记录了心肌梗死(MI)的频率,因出血过多,肾功能不全和脑部并发症引起的再次手术。结果:71名患者入选了该研究,其中7名因呼吸道困难,出血和技术困难而被排除在外。 RG包括33例患者,LDFG包括31例患者。两组之间在年龄,Euroscore,手术类型,体外循环和主动脉夹钳时间方面无差异。我们在两组之间的心脏指数,CKMB,拔管时间,动员时间,在ICU和住院时间方面没有发现显着差异。术后并发症如心肌梗死,再手术率,肾和脑并发症以及心房颤动的发生率均无明显差异。结论:瑞芬太尼对心脏患者进行快速麻醉对心肌功能没有负面影响。瑞芬太尼和小剂量芬太尼对快速心脏麻醉同样有效且安全。该研究没有显示瑞芬太尼麻醉比低剂量芬太尼麻醉有任何统计学优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号