首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club >Clarification of collection data for the type specimens of Hutton's Shearwater Pufftnus huttoni Mathews, 1912, and implications for the accuracy of historic subantarctic specimen data
【24h】

Clarification of collection data for the type specimens of Hutton's Shearwater Pufftnus huttoni Mathews, 1912, and implications for the accuracy of historic subantarctic specimen data

机译:阐明赫顿的Shearwater Pufftnus huttoni Mathews,1912年的类型标本的采集数据,以及对历史性亚南极标本数据准确性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Collection information for the type material of Hutton's Shearwater Puffinus huttoni Mathews, 1912, has long been debated. Contrary to some previous studies, we conclude that Sigvard Dannefaerd did not collect the holotype, now in the American Museumof Natural History (New York), nor was it collected in 1894. A more plausible scenario is that Henry Travers shot it off the subantarctic Snares Islands in January 1890. A sole para type of the taxon, previously overlooked in the Natural History Museum (Tring), was perhaps collected in South Australia. Dannefaerd never visited New Zealand's subantarctic region, so several other type specimens supposedly collected by him there in 1894 must also have incorrect collection data.
机译:长期以来,人们一直在争论关于Hutton的Shearwater Puffinus huttoni Mathews的字体资料的收集信息。与以前的一些研究相反,我们得出的结论是,西格瓦德·丹内法尔(Sigvard Dannefaerd)并未在美国自然历史博物馆(纽约)中收集整型,也未在1894年进行收集。更合理的情况是,亨利·特拉弗斯(Henry Travers)将其从亚南极的圈套器中射出。 1890年1月的岛屿。以前在自然历史博物馆(Tring)中被忽略的一种分类单元是唯一的一种分类,可能是在南澳大利亚收集的。 Dannefaerd从未访问过新西兰的亚南极地区,因此,据称他在1894年在那里采集的其他几类标本也必须具有不正确的采集数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号