...
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of health economics: HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care >Cost utility analysis of knee prosthesis with complete microprocessor control (C-leg) compared with mechanical technology in trans-femoral amputees.
【24h】

Cost utility analysis of knee prosthesis with complete microprocessor control (C-leg) compared with mechanical technology in trans-femoral amputees.

机译:与经股截肢者的机械技术相比,具有完整微处理器控制(C腿)的膝关节假体的成本效用分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The study determines the cost-utility of a unilateral electronic knee prosthesis (C-leg) compared to mechanical alternatives in trans-femoral amputees. For each type of prosthesis, 50 patients, treated in a major Italian centre, were enrolled. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated from responses to EuroQol (EQ-5D). Healthcare and social costs were assessed for the estimated life cycle of the technologies (5 years). C-leg was associated with 0.09 more QALYs per patient per year (P = 0.007). For the 5-year period, the incremental cost-utility ratio of C-leg resulted in euro 35,971 per QALY from the healthcare system perspective. If non-healthcare costs and productivity losses are included, the two groups to have similar costs (euro 66,669 vs euro 66,927).
机译:该研究确定了与经股截肢者的机械替代相比,单侧电子膝关节假体(C腿)的成本效益。对于每种假体,均招募了在意大利一家主要中心接受治疗的50名患者。根据对EuroQol(EQ-5D)的评估,估计了质量调整生命年(QALYs)。针对技术的估计生命周期(5年)评估了医疗保健和社会成本。 C腿与每名患者每年增加0.09 QALY相关(P = 0.007)。从医疗保健系统的角度来看,在5年期间,C腿的增量成本-使用率使每QALY达到35,971欧元。如果将非医疗保健费用和生产力损失包括在内,则两组的费用相似(66,669欧元对66,927欧元)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号