【24h】

Vaccination versus 'wait and treat': how to subsidize them?

机译:疫苗接种与“等待治疗”:如何补贴他们?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper we discuss the application of different co-payment rates to alternative medical strategies. Two such strategies are considered: a vaccination strategy knowing if they have the disease, and a "wait and treat" strategy, in which patients are treated later only if they contract the disease. We show the second approach should be more generously subsidized by the regulator. This is, at least at first sight, a surprising result.
机译:在本文中,我们讨论了不同的共付率在替代医学策略中的应用。考虑了两种这样的策略:一种知道他们是否患有疾病的疫苗接种策略,以及一种“等待并治疗”策略,在这种策略中,患者只有在感染了该疾病后才进行治疗。我们表明,第二种方法应由监管机构给予更大的补贴。至少乍看之下,这是一个令人惊讶的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号