首页> 外文期刊>The Developing Economies >ARE PRIVATE TRANSFERS CROWDED OUT BY PUBLIC TRANSFERS? THE CASE OF NEPAL
【24h】

ARE PRIVATE TRANSFERS CROWDED OUT BY PUBLIC TRANSFERS? THE CASE OF NEPAL

机译:私人转移是否被公共转移所淘汰?尼泊尔的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using household data from Nepal for 1995/96, this paper investigates the motives underlying private transfers and examines whether or not public transfers crowded out private transfers and the resultant effects on income inequality. The estimation results of Probit and Tobit models show that the private transfers received were altruistically motivated while public transfers exerted no crowding-out effect. Although the probability of receiving private transfers decreases with household size, having more children or more elderly members of the family increases the probability as well as the amount of transfers. By contrast, the age of the household head does not appear to be a significant factor. Furthermore, the study shows that public transfers didnot contribute to a lowering of income inequalities among households. These findings suggest that the Government of Nepal should design its public transfer schemes in order to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its social safety net programs.
机译:本文使用尼泊尔1995/96年度的家庭数据,调查了私人转移的潜在动机,并研究了公共转移是否挤占了私人转移及其对收入不平等的影响。 Probit和Tobit模型的估计结果表明,收到的私人转移是利他主义的动机,而公共转移没有挤出效应。尽管接受私人转移的可能性随家庭人数的增加而降低,但是有更多的孩子或更多的家庭成员会增加转移的可能性和数量。相比之下,户主的年龄似乎并不是一个重要因素。此外,研究表明,公共转移支付并没有减少家庭之间的收入不平等。这些发现表明,尼泊尔政府应设计其公共交通计划,以提高其社会安全网计划的有效性和效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号