首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of clinical psychology >A test of integration of the activation hypothesis and the diathesis-stress component of the hopelessness theory of depression.
【24h】

A test of integration of the activation hypothesis and the diathesis-stress component of the hopelessness theory of depression.

机译:对抑郁的绝望理论的激活假设和素质压力成分进行整合的检验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study tested the integration of the diathesis-stress component of the hopelessness theory of depression (Abramson, Metalsky, & Alloy, 1989) and Persons and Miranda's (1992) activation hypothesis (i.e. depressogenic inferential styles are typically latent cognitive processes that must be primed in order to be accurately assessed). DESIGN: In order to test the diathesis-stress component of the hopelessness theory, we used a short-term longitudinal design. In order to test the activation hypothesis, inferential styles were assessed both before and after a negative cognitive priming questionnaire. METHODS: A group of 165 university students completed measures of inferential styles about the self, consequences, and causes before and after completing a negative cognitive priming questionnaire (Time 1). Participants also completed measures of depressive symptoms prior to completing the cognitive priming questionnaire and 5 weeks later (Time 2). Finally, negative events occurring between Time 1 and Time 2 were assessed. RESULTS: Contrary to the diathesis-stress component of the hopelessness theory, none of the unprimed inferential styles interacted with negative events to predict increases in depressive symptoms. In line with the integration of the hopelessness theory and the activation hypothesis, however, each of the primed inferential styles interacted with negative events to predict increases in depressive symptoms even after controlling for the proportion of variance in depressive symptoms accounted for by the unprimed inferential style stress interactions. CONCLUSION: Individuals with depressogenic inferential styles are likely to show increases in depressive symptoms following the occurrence of negative events. At the same time, these depressogenic inferential styles are typically latent cognitive processes that must be primed in order to be accurately assessed.
机译:目的:这项前瞻性研究测试了抑郁的绝望理论(Abramson,Metalsky和&Alloy,1989年)和Persons and Miranda(1992年)的激活假设(即,抑郁推论风格是典型的潜在认知过程)的素质-压力成分的整合必须进行灌注以进行准确评估)。设计:为了测试绝望理论的素质压力成分,我们使用了短期纵向设计。为了检验激活假设,在否定认知启动问卷之前和之后都评估了推论风格。方法:一组165名大学生在完成否定的认知启动问卷(时间1)前后完成了关于自我,后果和原因的推断方式的测量。在完成认知启动问卷之前和5周后(时间2),参与者还完成了抑郁症状的测量。最后,评估了在时间1和时间2之间发生的负面事件。结果:与绝望理论的素质压力成分相反,没有任何一种原始的推论风格与负面事件发生相互作用,以预测抑郁症状的增加。然而,与绝望理论和激活假说的整合相一致,即使控制了由无用推理方式引起的抑郁症状的变化比例,每种有素的推理方式都与否定事件相互作用,以预测抑郁症状的增加。压力相互作用。结论:具有抑郁原推论风格的个体在出现负面事件后可能会表现出抑郁症状的增加。同时,这些令人沮丧的推论风格通常是潜在的认知过程,必须对其进行预备才能准确评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号