首页> 外文期刊>The British journal for the philosophy of science >Unification, explanation and explaining unity: The Fisher-Wright controversy
【24h】

Unification, explanation and explaining unity: The Fisher-Wright controversy

机译:统一,解释和解释统一:费舍尔-赖特之争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Morrison [2000] I argued that the frameworks and mechanisms that produce unification do not enable us to explain why the unified phenomena behave as they do. That is, we need to look beyond the unifying process for an explanation of these phenomena. Anya Plutynski ([2005]) has called into question my claim about the relationship between unification and explanation as well as my characterization of it in the context of the early synthesis of Mendelism with Darwinian natural selection. In this paper I argue that her methodological criticisms rest on a misinterpretation of my views on explanation and defend my historical interpretation of the work of Fisher and Wright.
机译:在Morrison [2000]中,我认为产生统一的框架和机制无法使我们解释统一现象为何如此行事。也就是说,我们需要超越统一过程来解释这些现象。 Anya Plutynski([2005])质疑了我关于统一与解释之间关系的主张,以及我在孟德尔主义与达尔文自然选择的早期综合的背景下对其特征的描述。在本文中,我认为她的方法论批评基于对我的解释观点的误解,并捍卫了我对费舍尔和赖特著作的历史解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号