首页> 外文期刊>The Analyst: The Analytical Journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry: A Monthly International Publication Dealing with All Branches of Analytical Chemistry >Direct infusion mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for human metabonomics? A serum metabonomic study of kidney cancer
【24h】

Direct infusion mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for human metabonomics? A serum metabonomic study of kidney cancer

机译:用于人体代谢组学的直接输注质谱还是液相色谱质谱?肾癌的血清代谢组学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Serum samples from kidney cancer patients and healthy controls were analyzed by both direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with a high resolution ESI-Q-TOFMS. The classification and biomarker discovery capacities of the two methods were compared, and MS/MS experiments were carried out to identify potential biomarkers. DIMS had comparable classification and prediction capabilities to LC-MS but consumed only ~5% of the analysis time. With regard to biomarker discovery, twenty-three variables were found as potential biomarkers by DIMS, and 48 variables were obtained by LC-MS. DIMS is recommended to be a fast diagnostic method for kidney cancer, while LC-MS is necessary when comprehensive screening of biomarkers is required.
机译:通过直接输注质谱(DIMS)和液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)以及高分辨率ESI-Q-TOFMS对来自肾癌患者和健康对照的血清样品进行了分析。比较了这两种方法的分类和生物标记物发现能力,并进行了MS / MS实验以鉴定潜在的生物标记物。 DIMS具有与LC-MS相当的分类和预测能力,但仅消耗约5%的分析时间。关于生物标志物的发现,DIMS发现了23个变量作为潜在的生物标志物,而LC-MS获得了48个变量。建议使用DIMS作为肾癌的快速诊断方法,而当需要全面筛选生物标志物时,则需要LC-MS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号