首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of hospice & palliative medicine >Assessing Somatic, Psychosocial, and Spiritual Distress of Patients with Advanced Cancer: Development of the Advanced Cancer Patients' Distress Scale
【24h】

Assessing Somatic, Psychosocial, and Spiritual Distress of Patients with Advanced Cancer: Development of the Advanced Cancer Patients' Distress Scale

机译:评估晚期癌症患者的躯体,心理和精神困扰:晚期癌症患者痛苦量表的制定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: For adequate distress assessment in palliative care, we developed a screening evaluation tool. Methods: Proven methods of scale construction led to a 53-item pilot form of the Advanced Cancer Patients' Distress Scale (ACPDS). We used Hornheide Questionnaire (HQ), Palliative Outcome Scale (POS), and Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) for validation. Advanced cancer patients (N = 168) from 3 centers for palliative medicine (aged 23-89, 51% female) filled out the questionnaire. Results: With a principal component analysis (PCA), we extracted 5 distress scales (emotional reactions/physical restrictions, communication deficits, negative social reactions, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Internal consistencies varied between medium (.52) and very good (.88). Positive validity scores were found. Conclusions: Using the ACPDS may help to identify needs for palliative care interventions and enhance the quality of palliative care.
机译:目的:为了对姑息治疗进行充分的痛苦评估,我们开发了一种筛查评估工具。方法:经过验证的量表构建方法导致了53个项目的试验形式的晚期癌症患者痛苦量表(ACPDS)。我们使用Hornheide问卷(HQ),姑息结果量表(POS)和最小文档系统(MIDOS)进行验证。来自3个姑息治疗中心的晚期癌症患者(N = 168)(23-89岁,女性51%)填写了问卷。结果:通过主成分分析(PCA),我们提取了5个困扰量表(情绪反应/身体限制,沟通不足,负面的社会反应,疼痛和胃肠道症状)。内部一致性在中等(.52)和非常好(.88)之间变化。发现阳性有效性得分。结论:使用ACPDS可能有助于确定姑息治疗干预措施的需求,并提高姑息治疗的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号