首页> 外文期刊>TAPPI Journal >Life-cycle thinking in the pulp and paper industry, part 2:1CA studies and opportunities for development
【24h】

Life-cycle thinking in the pulp and paper industry, part 2:1CA studies and opportunities for development

机译:纸浆和造纸行业的生命周期思考,第2部分:1CA研究和发展机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Part I of this study presented a critical survey of life-cycle assessment (LCA) applications in the pulp and paper industry.The objective of Part II is to characterize and understand the methodologies that have been used in reported LCA studies, including their limitations, and to identify opportunities for improvement of LCA methodologies. Factors examined include the type of LCA application, the source of the publication, the country of origin, the organization performing the study, the software used, and the degree of completeness of the study. We found that many LCA studies fail to include certain elements as defined by the standard International Organization for Standardization (ISO) methodology, in particular the quality assessment component. Most of the methodologies and databases used in the studies are appropriate for the European context, but not well adapted to North American specifics. There is, therefore, a need to develop North American methodologies and databases. Significant potential also exists for using LCA with other product and process analysis tools for enhanced decision-making.
机译:本研究的第一部分介绍了对纸浆和造纸行业生命周期评估(LCA)应用的重要调查。第二部分的目的是表征和了解已报道的LCA研究中使用的方法,包括其局限性,并找出改进LCA方法的机会。检查的因素包括LCA应用程序的类型,出版物的来源,原籍国,进行研究的组织,所使用的软件以及研究的完整性。我们发现,许多LCA研究未能包括标准国际标准化组织(ISO)方法所定义的某些要素,特别是质量评估组件。研究中使用的大多数方法和数据库都适合欧洲背景,但不适用于北美特定情况。因此,需要开发北美的方法和数据库。将LCA与其他产品和过程分析工具一起使用以增强决策能力也具有巨大潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号