首页> 外文期刊>Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry >Comparison of different extraction methods for the determination of statin drugs in wastewater and river water by HPLC/Q-TOF-MS
【24h】

Comparison of different extraction methods for the determination of statin drugs in wastewater and river water by HPLC/Q-TOF-MS

机译:HPLC / Q-TOF-MS测定废水和河水中他汀类药物的不同提取方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Three preconcentration techniques including solid phase extraction (SPE), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) have been optimized and compared for the analysis of six hypolipidaemic statin drugs (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin) in wastewater and river water samples by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC/Q-TOF-MS). Parameters that affect the efficiency of the different extraction methods such as solid phase material, sample pH and elution solvent in the case of SPE; the type and volume of the extracting and dispersive solvent, pH of sample, salt addition and number of extraction steps in the case of DLLME; and the stirring time, pH of sample, sample volume and salt addition for SBSE were evaluated. SPE allowed the best recoveries for most of the analytes. Pravastatin was poorly extracted by DLLME and could not be determined. SBSE was only applicable for lovastatin and simvastatin. However, despite the limitations of having poorer recovery than SPE, DLLME and SBSE offered some advantages because they are simple, require low organic solvent volumes and present low matrix effects. DLLME required less time of analysis, and for SBSE the stir-bar was re-usable. SPE, DLLME and SBSE provided method detection limits in the range of 0.04-11.2 ng L-1, 0.10-17.0 ng L-1 for 0.52-2.00 ng L-1, respectively, in real samples. To investigate and compare their applicability, SPE, DLLME and SBSE procedures were applied to the detection of statin drugs in effluent wastewater and river samples.
机译:优化了三种预浓缩技术,包括固相萃取(SPE),分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)和搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE),并比较了六种降血脂他汀类药物(阿托伐他汀,氟伐他汀,洛伐他汀,普伐他汀,高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱(HPLC / Q-TOF-MS)对废水和河水样品中的瑞舒伐他汀和辛伐他汀进行分析。在固相萃取的情况下,影响不同萃取方法效率的参数,例如固相材料,样品pH和洗脱溶剂;对于DLLME,萃取和分散溶剂的类型和体积,样品的pH值,加盐量和萃取步骤数;并评估了搅拌时间,样品的pH值,样品体积和SBSE的盐添加量。 SPE可以对大多数分析物实现最佳回收率。 DLLME提取普伐他汀的效果较差,无法确定。 SBSE仅适用于洛伐他汀和辛伐他汀。但是,尽管具有比SPE差的回收率的局限性,但DLLME和SBSE仍具有一些优势,因为它们简单,需要的有机溶剂量少且基质效应低。 DLLME需要更少的分析时间,对于SBSE,搅拌棒是可重复使用的。 SPE,DLLME和SBSE在实际样品中提供的方法检出限分别为0.02-11.2 ng L-1、0.52-2.00 ng L-1 0.10-17.0 ng L-1。为了研究和比较它们的适用性,将SPE,DLLME和SBSE方法应用于废水和河流样品中他汀类药物的检测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号