...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research >Comparative study of 2 surgical techniques for castration of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus)
【24h】

Comparative study of 2 surgical techniques for castration of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus)

机译:两种豚鼠去势手术技术的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare 2 surgical approaches (scrotal or abdominal) for castration of guinea pigs and to investigate post-operative infection rates with either technique. Forty-eight guinea pigs were castrated by scrotal or abdominal technique after being randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups (n = 24). Individuals were either castrated by an experienced exotic animal surgeon (n = 12) or by an experienced small animal surgeon (n = 12). Surgical wounds were evaluated daily before euthanasia for histological evaluation 2 wks after surgery. Post-operative infection rate was significantly higher in the scrotal group than in the abdominal group, with a higher rate for the experienced small animal surgeon. Castration of guinea pigs with the abdominal technique is significantly faster and has a significantly lower post-operative infection rate than the scrotal technique.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较两种手术方法(阴囊或腹部)对豚鼠的去势,并研究这两种技术的术后感染率。将48只豚鼠随机分为2组(n = 24)中的1组,通过阴囊或腹部技术cast割。由有经验的外来动物外科医生(n = 12)或有经验的小动物外科医生(n = 12))割个人。每天在安乐死之前评估手术伤口,术后2周进行组织学评估。阴囊组的术后感染率显着高于腹部组,有经验的小动物外科医生的感染率更高。与阴囊技术相比,采用腹部技术的豚鼠去势明显更快,并且术后感染率也显着降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号