...
首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Evaluation of chronic wound treatment with the SNaP wound care system versus modern dressing protocols.
【24h】

Evaluation of chronic wound treatment with the SNaP wound care system versus modern dressing protocols.

机译:SNaP伤口护理系统与现代敷料方案相比,对慢性伤口治疗的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Traditional negative-pressure wound therapy systems use an electrically powered pump to generate negative pressure at the wound bed. The SNaP Wound Care System is a novel, ultraportable device that delivers negative-pressure wound therapy without the use of an electrically powered pump. METHODS: At an outpatient wound care clinic, 21 subjects with difficult-to-treat lower extremity ulcers received treatment with the SNaP System and were evaluated for wound healing for up to 4 months. Outcomes were then compared with 42 patient-matched controls treated at the same center with modern wound care protocols that included the use of Apligraf, Regranex, and skin grafting. RESULTS: In the SNaP-treated group, 100 percent of subjects demonstrated improvement in wound size and 86 percent (18 of 21) exhibited a statistically significant healing trend (p < 0.05). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates of wound healing, SNaP-treated subjects healed in an average of 74.25 +/- 20.1 days from the start of SNaP treatment and the matched controls healed in an average of 148.73 +/- 63.1 days from the start of conventional treatment. This significantly faster healing time represents a 50 percent absolute reduction in time to healing (p < 0.0001) for subjects treated with the SNaP device. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reported here for the SNaP Wound Care System are similar to published reports for powered negative-pressure wound therapy devices for the treatment of highly challenging lower extremity wounds. This study suggests that the SNaP Wound Care System may be a useful addition to the techniques available to the wound care clinician.
机译:背景技术:传统的负压伤口治疗系统使用电动泵在伤口床处产生负压。 SNaP伤口护理系统是一种新型的超便携式设备,无需使用电动泵即可进行负压伤口治疗。方法:在门诊伤口护理诊所,对21例难以治疗的下肢溃疡患者进行SNaP系统治疗,并评估伤口愈合长达4个月。然后将结果与在同一中心接受现代伤口护理方案治疗的42位患者匹配的对照进行比较,这些方案包括使用Apligraf,Regranex和皮肤移植。结果:在SNaP治疗组中,有100%的受试者表现出伤口大小的改善,而86%(21名中的18名)表现出统计学上显着的愈合趋势(p <0.05)。使用Kaplan-Meier对伤口愈合的估计,从SNaP治疗开始,接受SNaP治疗的受试者平均治愈74.25 +/- 20.1天,而从常规开始,相匹配的对照组平均治愈148.73 +/- 63.1天治疗。对于使用SNaP装置治疗的受试者来说,明显快得多的治愈时间代表治愈时间绝对减少了50%(p <0.0001)。结论:SNaP伤口护理系统的报告结果与动力负压伤口治疗仪的公开报告相似,用于治疗高挑战性下肢伤口。这项研究表明,SNaP伤口护理系统可能是伤口护理临床医生可用技术的有用补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号