...
首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Safety device use affects the incidence patterns of facial trauma in motor vehicle collisions: an analysis of the National Trauma Database from 2000 to 2004.
【24h】

Safety device use affects the incidence patterns of facial trauma in motor vehicle collisions: an analysis of the National Trauma Database from 2000 to 2004.

机译:使用安全装置会影响机动车碰撞中面部创伤的发生方式:2000年至2004年国家创伤数据库的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Airbags and seat belts are designed to decrease injuries sustained in motor vehicle collisions. The authors hypothesize that the use of these devices has an effect on the patterns of facial fractures and facial lacerations. METHODS: The records of 15,293 facial fracture patients and 114,623 facial laceration patients from motor vehicle collisions were analyzed from the National Trauma Database. Five hundred sixty-five patients were identified as having panfacial fractures. Fisher's exact test and chi-square analysis were used to study associations between safety devices and facial trauma. RESULTS: Panfacial fractures occurred in 3.7 percent of all patients sustaining facial fractures. In motor vehicle collisions resulting in facial fractures, 31.2 percent of patients had a seat belt, 5.6 percent had a seat belt and an airbag, 3.9 percent had an airbag only, and 59.3 percent had no safety device. The lack of a safety device in motor vehicle collisions increased the incidence of facial fractures (odds ratio, 2.26), panfacial fractures (odds ratio, 2.98), and facial lacerations (odds ratio, 1.95). Passengers with facial fractures were more likely to have not used a safety device (odds ratio, 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the largest reported series on motor vehicle collision-associated facial fractures in the United States, the use of airbags and seat belts is associated with a significantly decreased incidence of facial fractures and lacerations. Given that fewer than half of these patients used a safety device and the high morbidity and costs associated with these injuries, plastic surgeons should advocate for the increased use of these safety devices.
机译:背景技术:安全气囊和安全带的设计旨在减少在机动车碰撞中遭受的伤害。作者假设使用这些设备会影响面部骨折和面部撕裂伤的发生方式。方法:从国家创伤数据库中分析了15,293例面部骨折患者和114,623例因汽车碰撞而造成的面部撕裂患者的记录。鉴定出565例患有面部骨折。 Fisher的精确检验和卡方分析用于研究安全装置与面部创伤之间的关联。结果:3.7%的维持面部骨折的患者发生了面部骨折。在导致面部骨折的机动车碰撞中,31.2%的患者装有安全带,5.6%的患者装有安全带和安全气囊,3.9%的患者只有安全气囊,59.3%的患者没有安全装置。机动车碰撞中缺乏安全装置会增加面部骨折(比值,2.26),面膜骨折(比值,2.98)和面部撕裂伤(比值,1.95)的发生率。面部骨折的旅客更有可能没有使用安全装置(赔率,1.69)。结论:根据美国报告的最大的与机动车碰撞相关的面部骨折系列,使用安全气囊和安全带可以大大减少面部骨折和撕裂伤的发生。鉴于这些患者中只有不到一半使用安全装置,而且与这些伤害相关的高发病率和高费用,整形外科医生应提倡增加使用这些安全装置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号