首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Comparison of Transthecal Digital Block and Traditional Digital Block for Anesthesia of the Finger
【24h】

Comparison of Transthecal Digital Block and Traditional Digital Block for Anesthesia of the Finger

机译:鞘式数字阻滞与传统数字阻滞在手指麻醉中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read the article by Keramidas et al.1 The authors performed a randomized, double-blind study in 50 patients to compare the transthecal and traditional subcutaneous infiltration techniques of digital block anesthesia with regard to the onset of time to achieve anesthesia and pain during the infiltration. However, none of the patients who received the subcutaneous infiltration block complained of pain at the digit. The technique of anesthesia preferred by patients for their finger was the subcutaneous infiltration block, because it causes less pain. Their results confirmed the efficacy of the transthecal block for achieving anesthesia of the finger; however, because it was a more painful procedure, it was not recommended
机译:我们阅读了Keramidas等人的文章。1作者对50例患者进行了一项随机,双盲研究,比较了数字阻断麻醉的经皮和传统皮下浸润技术,以及在麻醉过程中达到麻醉和疼痛的时间。浸润。但是,接受皮下浸润阻滞的患者无一抱怨手指趾疼痛。患者首选的手指麻醉技术是皮下渗透阻滞,因为它减轻了疼痛。他们的结果证实了穿刺阻滞剂对手指麻醉的功效。但是,由于这是一个比较痛苦的过程,因此不建议使用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号