...
首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Cross-face nerve graft with free-muscle transfer for reanimation of the paralyzed face: a comparative study of the single-stage and two-stage procedures.
【24h】

Cross-face nerve graft with free-muscle transfer for reanimation of the paralyzed face: a comparative study of the single-stage and two-stage procedures.

机译:交叉神经移植与自由肌转移使瘫痪的脸恢复活力:单阶段和两阶段程序的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The most accepted method for reanimation of the paralyzed face is the two-stage method that combines cross-face nerve graft with free-muscle transfer. Although the results of reconstruction with this method are satisfactory, there is an excessive delay between stages, which prolongs the period of rehabilitation. In 1995, Kumar overcame this and presented his preliminary results from a single-stage transfer of the gracilis. We compared the long-term results of the single-stage with the two-stage method of reconstruction. Patients selected the method of reconstruction on the basis of the information, photographs of scars, and video recording of results given to them at a special facial palsy clinic. Ten patients selected the single-stage reconstruction and 15 selected the two-stage reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 3 years. The results of the two methods are comparable, with 90 percent of the patients who underwent the single-stage and 93 percent of those who underwent the two-stage procedures having good and fair results. However, the two-stage method scored good symmetry at rest in 67 percent, compared with 20 percent for the single-stage method. There were fewer complications with the single-stage method, and none of the patients had any problems relating to the donor site. The period of rehabilitation was reduced by 10 months with the single-stage method.
机译:使瘫痪的脸复活最受接受的方法是两阶段方法,将横断面神经移植物与自由肌肉转移结合起来。尽管用这种方法重建的结果令人满意,但是阶段之间的延迟过长,延长了康复时间。 1995年,Kumar克服了这一难题,并提出了单步转移犬齿的初步结果。我们将单阶段的长期结果与两阶段的重建方法进行了比较。患者根据信息,疤痕照片以及在一家特殊的面部麻痹诊所获得的结果的视频录像来选择重建方法。 10名患者选择了单阶段重建,15名患者选择了两阶段重建。平均随访期为3年。两种方法的结果是可比的,接受单阶段手术的患者中有90%接受了两阶段手术的患者中,有93%的患者获得了良好而公正的结果。但是,两步法在静止时的对称性良好,为67%,而单步法为20%。单阶段方法的并发症更少,而且没有患者有与供体部位有关的任何问题。单阶段方法将康复期减少了10个月。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号