首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasonics >In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: Comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles
【24h】

In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: Comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles

机译:毛细管微循环的体外对比增强超声测量:聚合物和磷脂壳微泡之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The focus of contrast-enhanced ultrasound research has developed beyond visualizing the blood pool and its flow to new areas such as perfusion imaging, drug and gene therapy, and targeted imaging. In this work comparison between the application of polymer- and phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) for characterization of the capillary microcirculation is reported. All experiments are carried out using a microtube as a vessel phantom. The first set of experiments evaluates the optimal concentration level where backscattered signal from microbubbles depends on concentration linearly. For the polymer-shelled UCAs the optimal concentration level is reached at a value of about 2 × 10~4 MB/ml, whereas for the phospholipid-shelled UCAs the optimal level is found at about 1 × 10~5 MB/ml. Despite the fact that the polymer shell occupies 30% of the radius of microbubble, compared to 0.2% of the phospholipid-shelled bubble, approximately 5-fold lower concentration of the polymer UCA is needed for investigation compared to phospholipid-shelled analogues. In the second set of experiments, destruction/replenishment method with varied time intervals ranging from 2 ms to 3 s between destructive and monitoring pulses is employed. The dependence of the peak-to-peak amplitude of backscattered wave versus pulse interval is fitted with an exponential function of the time γ = A(1 - exp(-βt)) where A represents capillary volume and the time constant β represents velocity of the flow. Taking into account that backscattered signal is linearly proportional to the microbubble concentration, for both types of the UCAs it is observed that capillary volume is linearly proportional to the concentration of the microbubbles, but the estimation of the flow velocity is not affected by the change of the concentration. Using the single capillary model, for the phospholipid-shelled UCA a delay of about 0.2-0.3 s in evaluation of the perfusion characteristics is found while polymer-shelled UCA provide response immediately. The latter at the concentration lower than 3.6 × 10 ~5 MB/ml have no statistically significant delay (p < 0.01), do not cause any attenuation of the backscattered signal or saturation of the receiving part of the system. In conclusion, these results suggest that the novel polymer-shelled microbubbles have a potential to be used for perfusion evaluation.
机译:对比增强超声研究的重点已经超越了可视化血池及其流动的范围,而扩展到了诸如灌注成像,药物和基因治疗以及靶向成像等新领域。在这项工作中,报道了在使用聚合物和磷脂壳超声造影剂(UCA)表征毛细管微循环之间的比较。所有实验均使用微管作为容器体模进行。第一组实验评估了最佳浓度水平,其中微气泡的反向散射信号线性地取决于浓度。对于聚合物壳的UCA,最佳浓度水平约为2×10〜4 MB / ml,而对于磷脂壳的UCA,最佳浓度约为1×10〜5 MB / ml。尽管事实上聚合物壳占据了微泡半径的30%,而磷脂壳泡却占0.2%,但与磷脂壳类似物相比,聚合物UCA的浓度却要低约5倍。在第二组实验中,采用破坏/补充方法,在破坏性脉冲和监视脉冲之间的时间间隔从2 ms到3 s不等。背向散射波的峰峰值幅度与脉冲间隔的关系通过时间γ= A(1- exp(-βt))的指数函数进行拟合,其中A表示毛细管体积,时间常数β表示速度流。考虑到反向散射信号与微气泡浓度成线性比例,对于两种类型的UCA,可以观察到毛细管体积与微气泡浓度成线性比例,但是流速的估算不受浓度。使用单毛细管模型,对于磷脂壳的UCA,在评估灌注特性时发现约0.2-0.3 s的延迟,而聚合物壳的UCA立即提供响应。后者的浓度低于3.6×10〜5 MB / ml时,没有统计学上显着的延迟(p <0.01),不会引起反向散射信号的衰减或系统接收部分的饱和。总之,这些结果表明,新型的带聚合物壳的微泡具有用于灌注评估的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号