首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and politics international >Democracy’s Freudian Slip? Who’d Have Thought It?
【24h】

Democracy’s Freudian Slip? Who’d Have Thought It?

机译:民主的弗洛伊德遗书?谁想到了?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Referendum in the UK on 23rd June about Membership of the European Union appears to have resulted in a mistake. Democracy itself is up for questioning. Certain conditions should apply for democratic methods to succeed in reaching good decisions. It is however clear that Democracy like everything else is not perfect. It is better not to idealise Democracy as if it was perfect (and unlike everything else), and to struggle with what to do when it lets us down, and why it has done so on this occasion.
机译:6月23日在英国举行的有关加入欧盟的全民公决似乎导致了错误。民主本身值得质疑。某些条件应适用于民主方法,以成功地做出良好的决定。但是,很明显,民主与其他所有事物都不是完美的。最好不要将民主理想化,就像它是完美的(并且不同于其他所有事物)一样,并且在它使我们失望时要为该做的事情而苦苦挣扎,以及为什么这次要这样做。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号