【24h】

Omnia venenum sunt

机译:万物都是毒药

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are deep differences in perception of the chemical risk among common people and the evidence of risk derived from validated studies and observations.In addition to psychological factors such as dread,perceived uncontrollability and involuntary exposure,there is the lack of credibility in scientists(or in the managers of the science)and the conviction of intrinsic hazard of all synthetic chemicals.Furthermore,it is practically ignored that each new compound undergoes a long,meticulous and expensive process to verify its safety before the introduction on the market.Much experimental work is designed to describe the toxicity of new chemicals for regulatory purposes.Equally important are the investigative studies aimed at understanding the mechanisms of toxicity either as an aid to understanding basic biological processes or as a means of improving the ability to extrapolate laboratory experimental observations to humans.
机译:普通人对化学风险的认识与经验证的研究和观察所得出的风险证据之间存在着深远的差异。除了恐惧,感知的不可控制性和非自愿接触等心理因素外,科学家们缺乏可信度(或而且,人们几乎忽略了每种新化合物在投入市场之前都要经过漫长,细致而昂贵的过程来验证其安全性。许多实验工作设计用于描述新化学物质的毒性以达到监管目的。同样重要的是,旨在理解毒性机理的调查研究既可以帮助理解基本的生物过程,又可以提高将实验结果推算给人类的能力。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号