首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
【24h】

Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.

机译:二维和三维超声检查生物特征和胎儿体重:观察者间和观察者间可靠性和一致性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To evaluate and compare the intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement for the biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) obtained by two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US).Singleton pregnant women between 24 and 40 weeks were invited to participate in this study. They were examined using 2D-US in a blinded manner, twice by one observer, intercalated by a scan by a second observer, to determine BPD, AC and FL. In each of the three examinations, three 3D-US datasets (head, abdomen and thigh) were acquired for measurements of the same parameters. We determined EFW using Hadlock's formula. Systematic errors between 3D-US and 2D-US were examined using the paired t-test. Reliability and agreement were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), limits of agreement (LoA), SD of differences and proportion of differences below arbitrary points.We evaluated 102 singleton pregnancies. No significant systematic error between 2D-US and 3D-US was observed. The ICC values were higher for 3D-US in both intra- and interobserver evaluations; however, only for FL was there no overlap in the 95% CI. The LoA values were wider for 2D-US, suggesting that random errors were smaller when using 3D-US. Additionally, we observed that the SD values determined from 3D-US differences were smaller than those obtained for 2D-US. Higher proportions of differences were below the arbitrarily defined cut-off points when using 3D-US.3D-US improved the reliability and agreement of fetal measurements and EFW compared with 2D-US. Copyright ? 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:为了评估和比较观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性以及双顶径(BPD),腹围(AC),股骨长度(FL)和估计胎儿体重(EFW)的一致性,这些信息是通过二维超声(2D-US)和三个三维超声(3D-US):24至40周的单身孕妇被邀请参加这项研究。使用2D-US以盲法对它们进行检查,一位观察者两次,第二位观察者通过扫描插入,以确定BPD,AC和FL。在这三项检查中的每项检查中,都采集了三个3D-US数据集(头部,腹部和大腿)以测量相同的参数。我们使用Hadlock公式确定了EFW。使用配对t检验检查3D-US和2D-US之间的系统误差。通过组内相关系数(ICC),协议限制(LoA),差异的SD和差异在任意点以下的比例来评估可靠性和一致性。我们评估了102例单胎妊娠。在2D-US和3D-US之间没有观察到明显的系统误差。在观察者内部和观察者之间的评估中,3D-US的ICC值均较高;但是,只有FL的95%CI没有重叠。 2D-US的LoA值较宽,表明使用3D-US时的随机误差较小。此外,我们观察到,由3D-US差异确定的SD值小于2D-US所获得的SD值。使用3D-US时,更高比例的差异低于任意定义的分界点.3D-US与2D-US相比提高了胎儿测量和EFW的可靠性和一致性。版权? 2012年ISUOG。由John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号