首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology >Comparison of diffuse optical tomography, ultrasound elastography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast tumors
【24h】

Comparison of diffuse optical tomography, ultrasound elastography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast tumors

机译:弥散光学层析成像,超声弹性成像和乳腺X线摄影在乳腺肿瘤诊断中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies have reported the usefulness of diffuse optical tomography (DOT), ultrasound elastography (UE) and mammography in differentiating breast tumors. This study was aimed at evaluating and comparing DOT, UE and mammography with respect to their diagnostic performance in differentiating benign and malignant breast tumors. Of the 67 tumors, 45 were histopathologically benign, and 22 were malignant. UE was the most specific (93.33%) of the three diagnostics modalities. DOT and UE were both more accurate (80.60% and 89.55%, respectively) than mammography (63.08%). UE+ mammography (93.33% and 91.04%) and DOT+ mammography (77.78% and 82.09%) exhibited higher specificity and accuracy, respectively, than mammography alone (57.78% and 63.08%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the performance of the modalities. In conclusion, UE and DOT were superior to conventional mammography in terms of both specificity and accuracy. DOT and UE improve the specificity and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis, and combining the two modalities improves the diagnostic value.
机译:先前的研究报道了弥散性光学层析成像(DOT),超声弹性成像(UE)和乳房X线照相术在区分乳腺肿瘤中的有用性。这项研究旨在评估和比较DOT,UE和乳腺X线照相术在鉴别乳腺良性和恶性肿瘤方面的诊断性能。在67例肿瘤中,45例在组织病理学上是良性的,22例是恶性的。 UE是这三种诊断方式中最具体的(93.33%)。 DOT和UE的准确率(分别为80.60%和89.55%)比乳腺摄影(63.08%)更高。 UE +乳腺摄影(93.33%和91.04%)和DOT +乳腺摄影(77.78%和82.09%)分别比单独的乳腺摄影(57.78%和63.08%)显示更高的特异性和准确性。构建接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线以评估模态的性能。总之,就特异性和准确性而言,UE和DOT均优于传统的乳腺摄影。 DOT和UE提高了乳腺癌诊断的特异性和准确性,而两种方法的结合提高了诊断价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号