首页> 外文期刊>Psychology of religion and spirituality >God images and god concepts: Definitions, development, and dynamics
【24h】

God images and god concepts: Definitions, development, and dynamics

机译:神的形象和神的概念:定义,发展和动态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Within the god-image literature, there is semantic ambiguity surrounding god-image-related terms. For example, some authors have written of the God image and the God concept (referring to the former as the emotional experience of divine attachment figures such as God, Allah, or Jesus; e.g., Lawrence, 1997), whereas others have written of God images and God concepts (referring to the former as affect-laden mentaleural representations of divine attachment figures; e.g., Davis, 2010). For the god-image literature to continue growing and maturing, definitional consensus and conceptual clarity are needed. Therefore, in this article, we present working definitions of the terms god images and god concepts, with proposed conceptual contrasts. We also summarize the four attachment-based conceptualizations of god-image development and dynamics, highlighting the implicit-relational-knowing correspondence hypothesis (Hall, Fujikawa, Halcrow, Hill, & Delaney, 2009). Last, we propose a model of the schematic activation of god images, based on Cognitive-Affective Processing System theory (Mischel & Shoda, 2008).
机译:在神像文学中,围绕神像的术语存在语义上的歧义。例如,有些作者写了上帝的形象和上帝的概念(指前者是对上帝,真主或耶稣之类的神圣依恋人物的情感经历;例如劳伦斯,1997年),而另一些作者则写了上帝的著作。图像和神的概念(将前者称为充满情感的神圣依恋人物的心理/神经表征;例如,戴维斯,2010年)。为了使神像文学继续发展和成熟,需要定义上的共识和概念上的清晰。因此,在本文中,我们提出了关于神的形象和神的概念的工作定义,并提出了概念上的对比。我们还总结了基于四个依恋关系的神像发展和动力学的概念化,强调了隐性-关系-知识对应假设(Hall,Fujikawa,Halcrow,Hill和Delaney,2009)。最后,我们基于认知-情感处理系统理论(Mischel&Shoda,2008)提出了神像示意激活的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号