首页> 外文期刊>Quaternaire >Comparison of holocene anthracological signals, from various types of archives in germany: Toward a more detailed reconstruction of fire history? [Comparaison de signaux anthracologiques holocènes issus de différents types d'archives en allemagne: Vers une reconstitution plus précise de l'histoire des incendies?]
【24h】

Comparison of holocene anthracological signals, from various types of archives in germany: Toward a more detailed reconstruction of fire history? [Comparaison de signaux anthracologiques holocènes issus de différents types d'archives en allemagne: Vers une reconstitution plus précise de l'histoire des incendies?]

机译:来自德国各种类型档案馆的全新世人类学信号比较:着火历史的更详细重建? [来自德国不同类型档案的全新世人类学信号比较:要更精确地重建起火历史吗?]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Anthracology permits the reconstruction of both history and dynamics of past ecosystems based on various types of carbonized indicators. Various anthracological approaches allow the quantitative and/or qualitative analysis of the recording of those indicators, in various preservation contexts. Therefore, the relevance and significance of a chosen anthracological approach to a specific problematic, are directly related to the type of archive that have preserved on a long term scale the records. Consequently, the strategy for sampling and analysis will depend largely on the type of available archive. For instance, the spatial resolution of a signal would notably depend on the lake size and catchment area feature. In addition, the size of the carbonized pieces would have a role in the spatial resolution of the analyzed anthracological signal. The larger a carbonized piece, the most local its significance. Thus, the macroscopic and microscopic charcoal assemblages are commonly distinguished, and interpreted as having various spatial resolutions. Therefore, the analytical protocol must be adapted to the desired, or needed, spatial resolution. We postulate here that the comparative analysis of anthracological records, consisting of piece assemblages of various sizes, and sampled from various types of archives, allows one to improve the reconstruction of fire signals. To demonstrate that hypothesis, we compared anthracological assemblages from various archive types on two investigation areas in Germany. On each of those areas, we quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed charcoal records from sampled soils, and/or continental sediment sequences, and from peat sequences. We extracted the micro-, macro- and mega-charcoal assemblages. With the support of radiocarbon dating and of age/depth models, we observed synchronous and asynchronous patterns in the various signals analyzed, which highlight the utility and efficiency of such a complementary multi-proxy approach.
机译:人类学可以根据各种类型的碳化指标重建过去生态系统的历史和动态。各种人类学方法允许在各种保存环境中对这些指标的记录进行定量和/或定性分析。因此,所选择的人类学方法对特定问题的相关性和重要性直接与长期保存记录的档案类型有关。因此,采样和分析策略将在很大程度上取决于可用档案的类型。例如,信号的空间分辨率将特别取决于湖泊的大小和集水区特征。另外,碳化块的尺寸将在所分析的人类学信号的空间分辨率中起作用。碳化块越大,其意义就越局部。因此,通常区分宏观和微观木炭组合,并解释为具有各种空间分辨率。因此,分析方案必须适合所需或所需的空间分辨率。我们在此假设,对人类学记录的比较分析(包括各种大小的碎片集合并从各种类型的档案中取样)可以改善火灾信号的重建。为了证明这一假设,我们在德国的两个调查区域比较了各种档案类型的人类学组合。在这些区域的每一个上,我们都定量和定性地分析了采样土壤和/或大陆沉积序列以及泥炭序列中的木炭记录。我们提取了微型,大型和大型木炭组合。在放射性碳测年和年龄/深度模型的支持下,我们在分析的各种信号中观察到了同步模式和异步模式,这突显了这种互补的多代理方法的实用性和效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号