首页> 外文期刊>Chimica oggi: international journal of chemistry and biotechnology >Carryover and occupational exposure limits: can they be correlated?
【24h】

Carryover and occupational exposure limits: can they be correlated?

机译:残留物和职业接触限值:它们可以相互关联吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tne point-of-departure for calculating a carryover limit (toxicity and pharmacology) can be the same as the one used for calculating occupational exposure limits (OEL). We calculated carryover limits with three different approaches for the purpose of comparing them to their respective OELs and assessing possible correlations. We selected several drug substances with different mechanisms of action. Calculating carryover limits from LD_(50) (LDDE) resulted consistently in much higher values than with other methods. Comparison of the OELs and permissible daily exposures (PDEs) has revealed no constant relation between the values, because there was a difference in the point-of-departure used for calculation, as well as in the use of different safety factors for different target populations (e.g. patients, employees). Looking at the log values we found a significant correlation (calculated after Pearson) between PDE and OEL and PDE and carryover value (COV). LDDE has shown the least similarity to all other values. Most similarities were found between PDE and COV.
机译:用于计算残留限量(毒性和药理学)的出发点可以与用于计算职业暴露限值(OEL)的出发点相同。我们使用三种不同的方法计算了结转限额,目的是将其与各自的OEL进行比较并评估可能的相关性。我们选择了几种具有不同作用机理的药物。根据LD_(50)(LDDE)计算结转限制,结果始终比其他方法高得多。 OEL和每日允许暴露量(PDE)的比较显示,这些值之间没有恒定的关系,因为用于计算的出发点以及针对不同目标人群的不同安全系数的使用存在差异(例如患者,员工)。查看对数值,我们发现PDE与OEL和PDE与结转值(COV)之间存在显着相关性(根据Pearson计算)。 LDDE与所有其他值的相似性最小。在PDE和COV之间发现了大多数相似之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号