...
首页> 外文期刊>Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer >Banking on Fatherhood: pilot studies of a computerized educational tool on sperm banking before cancer treatment.
【24h】

Banking on Fatherhood: pilot studies of a computerized educational tool on sperm banking before cancer treatment.

机译:父权银行业务:癌症治疗前对精子银行业务计算机化教育工具的试点研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: We conducted pilot studies of the feasibility and efficacy of an interactive, computerized educational tool, Banking on Fatherhood (BOF). METHODS: Two small randomized trials were conducted, with 20 male cancer patients eligible to bank sperm in Study 1 and 19 oncology fellows or residents in Study 2. In each trial, half of the subjects viewed BOF before completing questionnaires, and half viewed it afterward. Outcome measures included a knowledge test in both trials and a Decisional Conflict scale in the patient trial. All participants, plus a panel of 10 experts, ultimately viewed BOF and completed a form evaluating its usability and value. RESULTS: Patients who completed questionnaires after viewing BOF had significantly less decisional conflict about banking sperm than those who had not viewed it (P=0.0065), but knowledge scores were not significantly different between groups. Physicians who filled out questionnaires after viewing BOF scored significantly higher on the knowledge test (P<0.006). Patients, physicians and experts rated BOF as easy to use, informative and addressing important psychosocial concerns, with videos and animations adding to the value of the educational tool. CONCLUSION: Pilot studies suggest that BOF is a feasible intervention that could enhance decisions about sperm banking. Research with larger groups is needed to validate its effectiveness.
机译:目标:我们进行了一项互动研究,计算机化的教育工具“父子银行”(BOF)的可行性和有效性的试点研究。方法:进行了两项小型随机试验,在研究1中有20名男性癌症患者符合精子库的资格,在研究2中有19名肿瘤学研究员或居民。在每项试验中,一半的受试者在完成问卷之前看过BOF,一半在事后看过BOF。 。结果测量包括两项试验中的知识测验和患者试验中的决策冲突量表。所有参与者以及由10名专家组成的小组最终查看了BOF,并填写了评估其可用性和价值的表格。结果:观察BOF后完成问卷的患者与没有观察过BOF的患者相比,关于银行精子的决策冲突明显更少(P = 0.0065),但是两组之间的知识得分没有显着差异。在查看BOF后填写问卷的医师在知识测验中的得分显着更高(P <0.006)。患者,医师和专家将BOF评为易于使用,提供信息并解决重要的社会心理问题,并通过视频和动画增加了教育工具的价值。结论:初步研究表明,转炉是一种可行的干预措施,可以增强有关精子库的决策。需要与更大的团体进行研究以验证其有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号