首页> 外文期刊>Psychology & marketing >Comparing Leading Theoretical Models of Behavioral Predictions and Post-Behavior Evaluations
【24h】

Comparing Leading Theoretical Models of Behavioral Predictions and Post-Behavior Evaluations

机译:比较行为预测和行为后评估的领先理论模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study aimed at comparing the predictive power of the Theoryof Planned Behavior (TPB), the Model of Goal-Directed Behavior(MGB), and the Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior (EMGB)for observed and self-reported behaviors concerning consumernondurables. More specifically, the three models were compared interms of their predictive power for intention and for behavioraldesire (only MGB and EMGB). Additionally, the validity of four differ-ent models for predicting post-behavior evaluations was examined.Results showed that the EMGB is the most powerful in predictingboth intention and behavioral desire. Moreover, results revealed that,as expected, all three models showed a better predictive power forSRB than for observed behavior. Finally, results demonstrated thatpost-behavior evaluations are both online and memory-based.
机译:这项研究旨在比较计划行为理论(TPB),目标导向行为模型(MGB)和目标导向行为扩展模型(EMGB)的预测能力对非消费者耐用品的观察和自我报告行为的能力。更具体地说,比较了这三个模型在意图和行为期望(仅MGB和EMGB)方面的预测能力。此外,还检验了四种不同的行为后评估模型的有效性。结果表明,EMGB在预测意图和行为欲望方面最有效。此外,结果表明,正如预期的那样,所有三个模型对SRB的预测能力都比对观察到的行为更好。最后,结果表明行为后评估是基于在线和基于内存的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号