...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry research >Disentangling impulsiveness, aggressiveness and impulsive aggression: an empirical approach using self-report measures.
【24h】

Disentangling impulsiveness, aggressiveness and impulsive aggression: an empirical approach using self-report measures.

机译:解开冲动性,侵略性和冲动性侵略:使用自我报告测度的经验方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is confusion in the literature concerning the concept of impulsive aggression. Based on previous research, we hypothesize that impulsivity and aggression may be related, though not as closely as to consider them the same construct. So, our aim was to provide empirical evidence of the relationship between the impulsivity and aggressiveness constructs when considered as traits. Two widely used questionnaires [Barratt's Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and Aggression Questionnaire-Refined (AQ-R)] were administered to 768 healthy respondents. Product-moment and canonical correlations were then calculated. In addition, a principal components analysis was conducted to explore whether impulsive aggression can be defined phenotypically as the expression of a single trait. The common variance between impulsivity and aggressiveness was never higher than 42%. The principal components analysis reveals that one component is not enough to represent all the variables. In conclusion, our results show that impulsivity and aggressiveness are two separate, although related constructs. This is particularly important in view of the misconceptions in the literature.
机译:关于冲动性侵略的概念在文献中存在混淆。基于先前的研究,我们假设冲动性和攻击性可能是相关的,尽管并没有像将它们视为同一构造那样紧密。因此,我们的目的是为冲动性和侵略性构造之间的关系提供经验证据。对768名健康受访者进行了两份广泛使用的调查表[Barratt冲动量表(BIS)和侵略问卷(AQ-R)]。然后计算乘积矩和典范相关性。此外,进行了主成分分析,以探索是否可以将冲动性攻击表型定义为单个特征的表达。冲动性和侵略性之间的共同差异从未高于42%。主成分分析表明,一个成分不足以代表所有变量。总之,我们的结果表明,冲动性和侵略性是两个独立的,尽管相互关联的结构。鉴于文学中的误解,这一点尤其重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号