首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Chemistry >Differing perspectives on the use of scientific evidence and the precautionary principle
【24h】

Differing perspectives on the use of scientific evidence and the precautionary principle

机译:关于使用科学证据和预防原则的不同观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different governments and agencies are approaching the use of scientific evidence, weight of evidence, and the precautionary principle in different ways. The European Community has used the precautionary principle in situations where the consequences are great, data are unavailable or will be costly (in terms of money and time) to obtain, or data are difficult or impossible to obtain. Other countries, such as the United States, have a risk assessment process that has built-in safety or uncertainty factors which are themselves precautionary. Risk management decisions can be made on the basis of adequate studies, risk assessment, weight-of-evidence approaches, and the application of the precautionary principle. While weight of evidence has been used in the United States for increased research funding and regulator action with respect to some chemicals that are hormonally active, the European Community has applied the precautionary principle. [References: None]
机译:不同的政府和机构正在以不同的方式处理科学证据的使用,证据的权重和预防原则。在后果严重,无法获取数据或获取成本高昂(金钱和时间方面),或难以获取或无法获取数据的情况下,欧洲共同体使用了预防原则。其他国家(例如美国)的风险评估过程具有内置的安全性或不确定性因素,这些因素本身就是预防因素。可以基于充分的研究,风险评估,证据权重方法和预防原则的应用来做出风险管理决策。尽管在美国已经使用了足够的证据来增加某些荷尔蒙活性化学物质的研究经费和监管机构的行动,但欧洲共同体已经采取了预防原则。 [参考:无]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号