...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing.
【24h】

Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing.

机译:在患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)中测量社会健康:项目库的开发和测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To develop a social health measurement framework, to test items in diverse populations and to develop item response theory (IRT) item banks. METHODS: A literature review guided framework development of Social Function and Social Relationships sub-domains. Items were revised based on patient feedback, and Social Function items were field-tested. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), two-parameter IRT modeling and evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF). RESULTS: The analytic sample included 956 general population respondents who answered 56 Ability to Participate and 56 Satisfaction with Participation items. EFA and CFA identified three Ability to Participate sub-domains. However, because of positive and negative wording, and content redundancy, many items did not fit the IRT model, so item banks do not yet exist. EFA, CFA and IRT identified two preliminary Satisfaction item banks. One item exhibited trivial age DIF. CONCLUSION: After extensive item preparation and review, EFA-, CFA- and IRT-guided item banks help provide increased measurement precision and flexibility. Two Satisfaction short forms are available for use in research and clinical practice. This initial validation study resulted in revised item pools that are currently undergoing testing in new clinical samples and populations.
机译:目的:建立一个社会健康评估框架,测试不同人群中的项目,并开发项目反应理论(IRT)项目库。方法:文献综述指导社会功能和社会关系子域的框架发展。根据患者反馈对项目进行了修订,并对社交功能项目进行了现场测试。分析包括探索性因素分析(EFA),确认性因素分析(CFA),两参数IRT建模和差异项功能评估(DIF)。结果:该分析样本包括956位一般人群受访者,他们回答了56项参与能力和56项参与满意度。 EFA和CFA确定了三种参与子域的能力。但是,由于措辞的正面和负面以及内容的冗余,许多项目不符合IRT模型,因此尚不存在项目库。 EFA,CFA和IRT确定了两个初步的满意度项目库。一件物品的年龄DIF很小。结论:经过广泛的项目准备和审查之后,EFA,CFA和IRT指导的项目库可帮助提高测量精度和灵活性。有两种满意度简短形式可用于研究和临床实践。这项最初的验证研究产生了修订后的项目库,目前正在对新的临床样本和人群进行测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号