首页> 外文期刊>Publishing research quarterly >Researchers’ Mobility, Productivity and Impact: Case of Top Producing Authors in Seven Disciplines
【24h】

Researchers’ Mobility, Productivity and Impact: Case of Top Producing Authors in Seven Disciplines

机译:研究人员的流动性,生产率和影响力:七个学科的杰出论文作者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine whether scientific mobility, either between countries or between affiliations has an effect on researchers’ productivity and impact. In order to investigate this issue, we examined the relationships between the number of institutional affiliations and countries of the top 100 authors in seven disciplines. The selected authors’ profiles contained the number of affiliations and countries each author is assigned. We studied the number of affiliations and countries and compared them to three bibliometric indicators: the number of publications in international, peer-reviewed journals, h-index and Field Weighted Citations Impact. Our findings show that although there are differences in the relationship between mobility, productivity and impact between disciplines, mobility between at least two affiliations has an overall positive effect on both output and impact while mobility between countries does not. Therefore, in most disciplines positive impact and productivity effects are tracked in affiliation mobility within a single country.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验国家之间或从属关系之间的科学流动性是否对研究人员的生产率和影响产生影响。为了调查此问题,我们研究了机构隶属关系数量与七个学科中排名前100位的作者所在国家/地区之间的关系。所选作者的个人资料包含每个作者的隶属关系和国家/地区。我们研究了隶属关系和国家/地区的数量,并将它们与三个文献计量指标进行了比较:国际,经过同行评审的期刊上的出版物数量,h指数和《领域加权引文影响》。我们的研究结果表明,尽管人才流动,生产力和学科之间的影响之间存在差异,但至少两个分支之间的人才流动对产出和影响都有总体积极影响,而国家之间的人才流动却没有。因此,在大多数学科中,在单个国家内的联盟流动性中都跟踪了积极影响和生产力影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号