首页> 外文期刊>Psychophysiology >Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence processing: Insights from ERPs and picture-sentence verification
【24h】

Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence processing: Insights from ERPs and picture-sentence verification

机译:理解视觉上下文如何影响增量句处理:ERP和图片句子验证的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To re-establish picture-sentence verification-discredited possibly for its over-reliance on post-sentence response time (RT) measures-as a task for situated comprehension, we collected event-related brain potentials (ERPs) as participants read a subject-verb-object sentence, and RTs indicating whether or not the verb matched a previously depicted action. For mismatches (vs. matches), speeded RTs were longer, verb N400s over centro-parietal scalp larger, and ERPs to the object noun more negative. RTs (congruence effect) correlated inversely with the centro-parietal verb N400s, and positively with the object ERP congruence effects. Verb N400s, object ERPs, and verbal working memory scores predicted more variance in RT effects (50%) than N400s alone. Thus, (1) verification processing is not all post-sentence; (2) simple priming cannot account for these results; and (3) verification tasks can inform studies of situated comprehension.
机译:为了重新建立图片句子验证机制(可能由于其过度依赖句子后响应时间(RT)措施而被贬低)作为定位理解的一项任务,我们收集了与参与者相关的事件相关脑电势(ERP),当参与者阅读一个主题时,动词-宾语句子和RT,指示动词是否与先前描述的动作匹配。对于不匹配(相对于匹配),加速的RT更长,动词N400在顶顶头皮上更大,ERP到宾语名词更否定。 RTs(全等效应)与中心顶动词N400s成反比,与宾语ERP全等成正比。动词N400,对象ERP和言语工作记忆得分比单独的N400预测RT效果的差异更大(50%)。因此,(1)验证处理并非全部为句子后; (2)简单的启动不能解释这些结果; (3)验证任务可以为情境理解研究提供参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号