首页> 外文期刊>Psychophysiology >Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?
【24h】

Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?

机译:正交和相关邻域密度效应:共有什么,有什么不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of associates of words (NoA), a variable directly affecting overall semantic activation, and compared this to the ERP effect of the number of orthographic neighbors (N) in a lexical decision task. Words with high NoA and with high N produced a very similar increase of the N400. In addition, a higher N increased the amplitude of the Late Positive Complex. The common N400 effect suggests that N affects semantic activation, like NoA does. The late positive effect specific to N could occur because words with few orthographic neighbors initially elicit little activity in the orthographic system, thereby resembling nonwords, which leads to distinct processing.
机译:与正交正交少的单词相比,具有正交正交的单词引起的N400更大。由于正交邻域激活其语义表示,这被解释为更强的整体语义激活。为了调查这一说法,我们操纵了单词联想(NoA)的数量,该变量直接影响整体语义激活,并将其与词汇决策任务中正交拼字邻居(N)的ERP效果进行比较。 NoA高和N高的单词对N400的增加非常相似。另外,较高的N增加了后期正复合体的振幅。常见的N400效应表明N像NoA一样会影响语义激活。 N特有的后期积极效应之所以会发生,是因为正交拼写相邻词很少的单词最初在正交拼写系统中几乎没有活动,从而类似于非单词,这导致了不同的处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号