...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychophysiology >Cardiac autonomic balance versus cardiac regulatory capacity
【24h】

Cardiac autonomic balance versus cardiac regulatory capacity

机译:心脏自主神经平衡与心脏调节能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The concept of autonomic balance views autonomic states along a bipolar continuum from sympathetic (S) to parasympathetic (P) dominance, whereas regulatory capacity models emphasize overall autonomic flexibility as a marker of the capacity for regulation. These two concepts were evaluated for their utility in characterizing patterns of autonomic control. Measures of P (high frequency heart rate variability, HF) and S (preejection period, PEP) cardiac control were obtained. A measure of cardiac autonomic balance (CAB) was derived as the difference in the normalized P index minus the S index, and a measure of cardiac autonomic regulation (CAR) was derived as the normalized P index plus the S index. Results reveal that CAR, but not CAB, was a significant predictor of the prior occurrence of a myocardial infarction, net of demographic and other variables, whereas CAB, but not CAR, was a significant predictor of concurrent diabetes.
机译:自主性平衡的概念将双极连续体的自主状态视为从交感(S)到副交感(P)优势,而调节能力模型则强调总体自主神经作为调节能力的标志。对这两个概念在表征自主控制模式方面的实用性进行了评估。获得了P(高频心率变异性,HF)和S(射血期,PEP)心脏控制的量度。以标准化的P指数减去S指数的差得出心脏自主神经平衡(CAB)的值,并以标准化的P指数加S指数得出心脏自主调节的量度(CAR)。结果表明,CAR(而不是CAB)是预测先前发生的心肌梗死(人口统计学和其他变量净值)的重要预测因素,而CAB(而非CAR)是并发糖尿病的重要预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号