首页> 外文期刊>Prosthetics and orthotics international >Wound healing: total contact cast vs. custom-made temporary footwear for patients with diabetic foot ulceration.
【24h】

Wound healing: total contact cast vs. custom-made temporary footwear for patients with diabetic foot ulceration.

机译:伤口愈合:针对糖尿病足溃疡患者的全接触式石膏与定制临时鞋的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of irremovable total-contact casts (TCC) and custom-made temporary footwear (CTF) to heal neuropathic foot ulcerations in individuals with diabetes. In this prospective clinical trial, 43 patients with plantar ulcer Grade 1 or 2 (Wagner scale) were randomized to one of two off-loading modalities: TCC or CTF. Outcomes assessed were wound surface area reduction (cm2) and time to wound healing (days) at 2, 4, 8 and 16 weeks. To evaluate safety, possible side effects were recorded at each follow-up visit. The results showed no significant difference in wound surface area reduction (adjusted for baseline wound surface) at 2, 4, 8 or 16 weeks (adjusted mean difference 0.10 cm2; 95% CI -0.92-0.72 at 16 weeks). At 16 weeks, 12 patients had a completely healed ulcer, 6 per group. The median time to healing was shorter for the patients using a cast (52 vs. 90 days, p = 0.26). Five patients with TCC and two with CTF developed device-related complications. It was concluded that: (i) the rate of wound healing is not significantly different for patients treated with CTF or TCC. The difference in wound surface area was small and not significant at any time during follow-up; and (ii) the difference in healing time (38 days) may have attained statistical significance if the numbers in these sub-groups (2 x 6) had been higher. Since there appears to be little difference in effectiveness between both off-loading modalities, further investigation into the benefits of CTF is warranted.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较不可移动的全接触式石膏(TCC)和定制的临时鞋(CTF)在治愈糖尿病个体中治愈神经性足溃疡的有效性。在这项前瞻性临床试验中,将43例足底溃疡1级或2级(Wagner评分)的患者随机分配至两种减负荷方式之一:TCC或CTF。评估的结果是伤口表面积减少(cm2)和伤口愈合时间(天)在2、4、8和16周。为了评估安全性,每次随访都记录了可能的副作用。结果显示,在2、4、8或16周时,伤口表面积的减少(针对基线伤口表面进行了调整)没有显着差异(在16周时,调整后的平均差异为0.10 cm2; 95%CI -0.92-0.72)。在16周时,有12名患者完全治愈了溃疡,每组6名。使用石膏模型的患者的中位治愈时间较短(52天对比90天,p = 0.26)。 5例TCC患者和2例CTF患者发生了器械相关并发症。结论是:(i)用CTF或TCC治疗的患者的伤口愈合率没有显着差异。伤口表面积的差异很小,在随访期间任何时候都不显着。 (ii)如果这些亚组(2 x 6)中的人数更高,则治愈时间的差异(38天)可能具有统计学意义。由于两种卸载方式在效果上似乎没有什么区别,因此有必要进一步研究CTF的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号