首页> 外文期刊>Progres en urologie: journal de l’Association francaise d’urologie et de la Societefrancaise d’urologie >The local anesthesia for the prostatic biopsies echo-guided: Forward-looking randomized study comparing two methods [L'anesthésie locale pour les biopsies prostatiques écho-guidées: étude prospective randomisée comparant deux méthodes]
【24h】

The local anesthesia for the prostatic biopsies echo-guided: Forward-looking randomized study comparing two methods [L'anesthésie locale pour les biopsies prostatiques écho-guidées: étude prospective randomisée comparant deux méthodes]

机译:回声引导前列腺活检的局部麻醉:前瞻性随机研究,比较两种方法[前瞻性随机麻醉对两种方法进行比较的前瞻性随机研究]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: The realization of the prostatic biopsies is a painful act. The objective of our work was to compare the analgesic efficiency of the injection of the lidocaine at the level of periprostatics laterals and apical areas compared with the use of gel of lidocaine intrarectal associated with the taking of oral tramadol. Patients and methods: Between November 2007 and December 2009, 60 patients admitted in the service of urology of the university hospital Mohammed VI of Marrakesh for prostatic biopsies were randomized in two groups. The group 1 (30 patients) received two tablets from tramadol 50. mg with 10. mL of gel of lidocaine 2% intrarectal while 30 patients of the group 2 received 10. mL from lidocaine 2% injected at the level of periprostatics laterals and apicales. The pain was estimated by a visual analog scale (AVS) at the introduction of the probe of echography (AVS 1), at the time of the biopsy (AVS 2) and 20. minutes later (AVS 3). Results: There was no significant difference between both groups concerning AVS 1 means. The average score of the pain was significantly lower in the group 2 for the AVS 2 and AVS 3. Conclusion: The periprostatics anesthesia assured a better control of the pain at the time of the prostatic biopsy and 20. minutes later, without increase of the complications. We recommend it to decrease the pain and the discomfort related to this technique.
机译:简介:前列腺活检的实现是一个痛苦的举动。我们的工作目的是比较与在口服曲马多时使用的利多卡因直肠内凝胶剂相比,在前列腺癌外侧和根尖水平注射利多卡因的镇痛效果。患者和方法:在2007年11月至2009年12月之间,将60例在马拉喀什穆罕默德六世大学医院进行泌尿外科手术的前列腺活检患者分为两组。第一组(30例患者)从曲马多(50毫克)中服用两片含10.mL利多卡因2%直肠内凝胶,而第2组的30例患者从10%的利多卡因(2%)直肠内注射。 。在穿刺技术检查时(AVS 1),活检时(AVS 2)和20分钟后(AVS 3),通过视觉模拟量表(AVS)评估疼痛。结果:两组间AVS 1均值无显着差异。对于AVS 2和AVS 3,第2组的平均疼痛评分明显较低。结论:前列腺穿刺麻醉确保在进行前列腺穿刺活检时和20分钟后能够更好地控制疼痛,而不会增加并发症。我们建议它减轻与该技术有关的疼痛和不适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号