首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society >Hillforts, Emotional Metaphors, and the Good Life: a Response to Armit
【24h】

Hillforts, Emotional Metaphors, and the Good Life: a Response to Armit

机译:希尔福特,情感隐喻和美好生活:对阿米特的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Hillforts have always been central to interpretations of Iron Age society and Ian Armit's paper in this journal (2007,) re-introduces the question of whether or not they represent 'endemic warfare'. This response will critique claims for warfare in the Early and Middle Iron Age of Wessex and present an alternative view of hillforts and how they may have been used. It is argued that within dispersed small scale agricultural societies the communal building, maintenance, and use of hillforts can act to structure the sociality of people whose interests are in creating a harmonious existence. Within this view, hillforts act as metaphors for the managing of emotional relationships within groups of people as they go about their daily lives.
机译:希尔福特一直以来都是铁器时代社会的核心解释,伊恩·阿米特(Ian Armit)在该期刊(2007年)中的论文重新介绍了它们是否代表“地方性战争”的问题。这种回应将对维塞克斯铁器时代的早期和中期的战争主张提出批评,并提出山坡及其使用方式的另一种观点。有人认为,在分散的小规模农业社会中,社区的建设,维护和利用可能会起到建设人们的社会关系的作用,这些人的利益在于创造和谐的生活。在这种观点下,爬山车是人们在日常生活中管理情感关系的隐喻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号