...
首页> 外文期刊>Popular Mechanics >REASONABLE DOUBT: THE SURPRISINGLY WEAK SCIENCE BEHIND COURTROOM FORENSICS
【24h】

REASONABLE DOUBT: THE SURPRISINGLY WEAK SCIENCE BEHIND COURTROOM FORENSICS

机译:合理的怀疑:法庭司法鉴定之后的科学薄弱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ON JAN. 11, 1992, THE JURY IN THE MURDER TRIAL OF ROY Brown heard from a dentist named Edward Mofson. To establish his credentials, Dr. Mofson testified that he was certified in forensic odontology, belonged to six related professional organizations and did forensic consulting throughout New York state. He then explained that several months earlier he was called to the morgue in Cayuga County, New York, to analyze the body of 49-year-old Sabina Kulakowski.
机译:一月1992年11月11日,罗伊(Roy)谋杀案的陪审团法官布朗(Brown)听取了名叫爱德华·莫夫森(Edward Mofson)的牙医的信。为了确立其资历,莫夫森博士作证说他已获得法医牙科学认证,属于六个相关专业组织,并在纽约州进行了法医咨询。然后他解释说,几个月前,他被召唤到纽约卡尤加县的太平间,分析了49岁的Sabina Kulakowski的尸体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号