首页> 外文期刊>Perception & psychophysics >Examining the validity of numerical ratios in loudness fractionation
【24h】

Examining the validity of numerical ratios in loudness fractionation

机译:检查响度分级中数字比率的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Direct psychophysical scaling procedures presuppose that observers are able to directly relate a numerical value to the sensation magnitude experienced. This assumption is based on fundamental conditions (specified by Luce, 2002), which were evaluated experimentally. The participants' task was to adjust the loudness of a 1-kHz tone so that it reached a certain prespecified fraction of the loudness of a reference tone. The results of the first experiment suggest that the listeners were indeed able to make adjustments on a ratio scale level. It was not possible, however, to interpret the nominal fractions used in the task as "true" scientific numbers. Thus, Stevens's (1956, 1975) fundamental assumption that an observer can directly assess the sensation magnitude a stimulus elicits did not hold. In the second experiment, the possibility of establishing a specific, strictly increasing transformation function that related the overt numerals to the latent mathematical numbers was investigated. The results indicate that this was not possible for the majority of the 7 participants.
机译:直接的心理物理定标程序以观察者能够直接将数值与所经历的感觉幅度相关为前提。该假设基于实验评估的基本条件(由Luce,2002指定)。参与者的任务是调整1 kHz音调的响度,以使其达到参考音响度的特定预定分数。第一个实验的结果表明,听众确实能够在比例等级上进行调整。但是,不可能将任务中使用的名义分数解释为“真实”科学数字。因此,史蒂文斯(1956,1975)的基本假设是观察者可以直接评估刺激所引起的感觉大小,但这并不成立。在第二个实验中,研究了建立一个特定的,严格增加的转换函数的可能性,该转换函数将明显的数字与潜在的数学数字相关联。结果表明,这对于7位参与者中的大多数来说是不可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号