首页> 外文期刊>Precambrian Research >A comment on 'Tectonic evolution of the Hengshan-Wutai-Fuping complexes and its implication for the Trans-North China Orogen'
【24h】

A comment on 'Tectonic evolution of the Hengshan-Wutai-Fuping complexes and its implication for the Trans-North China Orogen'

机译:评“衡山—五台—富平复合体的构造演化及其对华北造山带的意义”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a recent issue of Precambrian Research (vol. 170, pp. 73-87), Wang (2009) published a paper entitled 'Tectonic evolution of the Hengshan-Wutai-Fuping complexes and its implication for the Trans-North China Orogen, in which he proposes that (1) the formation of arc-related igneous rocks in the Hengshan and Wutai Complexes formed by northwest-directed subduction, not by(south)east-directed subduction; and (2) the Wutai granitoids were the products of an intra-oceanic island arc, not formed in a continent-derived arc. However, we consider both the structural and geochemical approaches Wang (2009) adopted to determine the polarity of the subduction and the tectonic setting of the Wutai granitoids are inappropriate or invalid. Firstly, all his structural observations used to determine the polarity of subduction are restricted to the Zhujiafang and Longquanguan ductitle shear zones, both of which developed at the late stage. It is unreliable to use kinematic indicators from these later structures to infer the polarity of the pre-collisional subduction. Secondly, Wang (2009) assumed that the initial positive epsilon(Nd) values (+0.5 to +4.5) of the Wutai granitoids indicate their generation directly from a mantle source, forming in an intra-oceanic arc. Such an interpretation is incorrect because the positive epsilon(Nd) values of the Wutai granitoids merely indicate that the igneous protoliths of these granitoids originated from a depleted mantle source, not the Wutai granitoids themselves. As the products of the earliest arc magmatism in the Wutai arc, the Wutai granitoids could not be generated directly from a mantle source but must have been derived by partial melting of juvenile crust.
机译:在最近一期的前寒武纪研究(第170卷,第73-87页)中,Wang(2009)发表了一篇题为《衡山—五台—富平复合体的构造演化及其对华北造山带的意义》的论文。他提出:(1)在衡山和五台复合物中形成的弧相关火成岩是由西北向俯冲而不是由(南)向东俯冲形成的; (2)五台花岗岩是海洋内岛状弧的产物,不是在大陆衍生的弧中形成的。然而,我们认为Wang(2009)采用的结构和地球化学方法来确定俯冲的极性和五台花岗岩的构造背景都是不合适或无效的。首先,他所有用于确定俯冲极性的结构观测值都局限于朱家房和龙泉关形剪切带,这两个区域都是在后期发展的。使用来自这些较晚结构的运动学指标来推断碰撞前俯冲的极性是不可靠的。其次,Wang(2009)认为,五台花岗岩的初始正ε(Nd)值(+0.5至+4.5)表明它们是直接从地幔源生成的,形成于洋内弧。这种解释是不正确的,因为五台花岗岩的正epsilon(Nd)值仅表明这些花岗岩的火成岩原岩是从贫瘠的地幔源而不是五台花岗岩本身产生的。作为五台弧最早的弧岩浆作用的产物,五台花岗岩不能直接从地幔源中产生,而必须是通过部分地壳熔融而获得的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号