...
首页> 外文期刊>Postgraduate medicine >Thrombolytic therapy versus primary angioplasty. Which offers the best outcome after myocardial infarction?
【24h】

Thrombolytic therapy versus primary angioplasty. Which offers the best outcome after myocardial infarction?

机译:溶栓治疗与原发性血管成形术。心肌梗死后哪个结果最好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The best technique for reestablishing blood flow after myocardial infarction has been the subject of heated debate for more than a decade. An the answer is still elusive. Which option is the safest? Which salvages the most heart tissue? Dr Faxon explains the pros and cons of both thrombolysis and angioplasty and discusses the "90 rule," which helps determine the optimal reperfusion strategy for each individual patient.
机译:十多年来,关于心肌梗死后恢复血流的最佳技术一直是争论的主题。答案仍然难以捉摸。哪个选项最安全?哪个组织能拯救最多的心脏组织? Faxon博士解释了溶栓和血管成形术的优缺点,并讨论了“ 90法则”,该法则有助于确定每个患者的最佳再灌注策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号