...
首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >A randomized comparison of the i-gel (TM) with the self-pressurized air-Q (TM) intubating laryngeal airway in children
【24h】

A randomized comparison of the i-gel (TM) with the self-pressurized air-Q (TM) intubating laryngeal airway in children

机译:儿童i-gel(TM)与自加压air-Q(TM)气管插管喉道的随机比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundSupraglottic airway devices with noninflatable cuff have advantages in omitting the cuff pressure monitoring and reducing potential pharyngolaryngeal complications. Typical devices without cuff inflation available in children are the i-gel and the self-pressurized air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q SP). To date, there is no comparative study between these devices in pediatric patients.
机译:背景技术具有非充气式袖带的声门上气道装置在省略袖带压力监测和减少潜在的咽喉并发症方面具有优势。儿童可使用的无袖带充气的典型设备是i-gel和自加压air-Q插管喉道(air-Q SP)。迄今为止,在儿科患者中这些装置之间尚无比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号