首页> 外文期刊>Population and Development Review >Pretransitional fertility in China
【24h】

Pretransitional fertility in China

机译:中国的过渡前生育

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Almost two decades ago, in this journal and elsewhere, Arthur Wolf and Ansley Coale engaged in a debate over the level of marital fertility in prerevolutionary China (Coale 1984, 1985; Wolf 1984, 1985). Coale and his colleagues, George Barclay, JamesTrussell, and Michael Stoto, after reanalyzing survey data collected from 40,000 farm families in 119 widely dispersed localities in China in 1929-31, not only concluded that marital fertility was lower in China than in historical Europe, but concurredthat such a low level "would be expected by demographers only in populations where some combination of contraception and abortion is practiced" (Barclay et al. 1976: 625). Wolf, relying largely on his own studies of earlytwentieth-century populations from Taiwan and his 1980-81 survey of 580 elderly women from seven other provinces, challenged their results and their explanation.
机译:大约二十年前,在亚瑟·沃尔夫(Arthur Wolf)和安斯利·库尔(Ansley Coale)的杂志上,围绕革命前中国的婚姻生育水平展开了辩论(Coale 1984,1985; Wolf 1984,1985)。 Coale及其同事George Barclay,JamesTrussell和Michael Stoto在重新分析1929-31年从中国119个广泛分布的地区的40,000个农场家庭收集的调查数据后,不仅得出结论,中国的婚姻生育率低于历史悠久的欧洲,但是同意这样低的水平“人口统计学家只会在实行避孕和流产相结合的人群中期望”(Barclay et al。1976:625)。沃尔夫在很大程度上依赖于自己对台湾20世纪早期人口的研究以及他对其他七个省的580名老年妇女的1980-81年调查,对他们的结果和解释提出了质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号