首页> 外文期刊>Population and Development Review >Could Pronatalist Policies Discourage Childbearing?
【24h】

Could Pronatalist Policies Discourage Childbearing?

机译:孕产妇政策会阻碍生育吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article builds on research in psychology, economics, and other fields, suggesting that, under certain conditions, extrinsic incentives could undermine intrinsic motivation, producing results opposite to those originally intended. It explores the relevance of these findings for population policies and particularly for pronatalist measures, and argues that reproductive behavior is intrinsically motivated, thus potentially subject to having the intrinsic motivation for childbearing adversely affected by policy interventions. Specifically, it examines whether, when, and how the contingency, universe, adequacy, and other aspects of pronatalist incentives could affect childbearing motivation. For example, parity-targeted incentives seeking to compel higher fertility could be perceived as controlling and undermine that motivation. Conversely, policies seeking to facilitate combining work and family responsibilities could strengthen the intrinsic motivation for childbearing.
机译:本文基于心理学,经济学和其他领域的研究,表明在某些条件下,外在动机可能会破坏内在动机,从而产生与最初意图相反的结果。它探讨了这些发现与人口政策,特别是与促孕措施的相关性,并认为生殖行为是内在动机的,因此有可能受到政策干预不利地影响生育的内在动机。具体来说,它研究了生育权诱因的偶然性,偶然性,普遍性,充分性和其他方面是否,何时以及如何影响生育动机。例如,试图强迫生育的以均等为目标的激励措施可能会被视为控制和破坏了这一动机。相反,寻求促进兼顾工作和家庭责任的政策可以加强生育的内在动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号