首页> 外文期刊>Social history of medicine: the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine >Refuse and the 'Risk Society': The Political Ecology of Risk in Inter-war Britain
【24h】

Refuse and the 'Risk Society': The Political Ecology of Risk in Inter-war Britain

机译:拒绝与“风险社会”:两次世界大战之间英国的风险政治生态学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article responds to current critiques of Ulrich Beck's 'risk society' thesis by historians of science and medicine. Those who have engaged with the concept of risk society have been content to accept the fundamental categories of Beck's analysis. In contrast, we argue that Beck's risk society thesis underplays two key themes. First, the role of capitalist social relations as the driver of technological change and the transformation of everyday life; and second, the ways in which hegemonic discourses of risk can be appropriated and transformed by counter-hegemonic forces. In place of 'risk society', we propose an approach based upon a 'political ecology of risk', which emphasises the social relations that are fundamental to the everyday politics of environmental health.
机译:本文回应了科学和医学史学家对乌尔里希·贝克(Ulrich Beck)的“风险社会”论题的当前批评。那些参与风险社会概念的人们已经满意地接受了贝克分析的基本范畴。相反,我们认为贝克的风险社会论题忽视了两个关键主题。首先,资本主义社会关系作为技术变革和日常生活转变的推动者;第二,霸权主义的风险话语可以通过反霸权势力加以运用和转变。代替“风险社会”,我们提出了一种基于“风险政治生态学”的方法,该方法强调了对日常环境卫生政治至关重要的社会关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号