...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy theory and practice >Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level.
【24h】

Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level.

机译:将测角仪与数字水平仪相比,肩部运动范围的可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The clinical use of digital levels, for joint measurement, may be a viable alternative to standard goniometry. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and intertester reliability of a construction grade digital level compared to the standard universal goniometer for measurements for active assisted shoulder range of motion (ROM). Two experienced physical therapists measured shoulder flexion, external rotation (ER), and internal rotation (IR) ROM bilaterally, on two different occasions, in 20 patients (9 males, 11 females, 18-79 years old) with unilateral shoulder pathology, using a goniometer and a digital level. Relative reliability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and absolute reliability was assessed by using 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Intratester ICCs ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, and LOA ranged from 3 degrees to 9 degrees for measurements made with the goniometer and digital level. Intertester ICCs ranged from 0.31 to 0.95, and LOA ranged from 6 degrees to 25 degrees . For the comparison of goniometric vs. digital level ROM, ICCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.98. ER and IR ROM were 3-5 degrees greater for the digital level than the goniometer (p < 0.01). Goniometric vs. digital level LOA ranged from 6 degrees to 11 degrees for shoulder flexion. Both measurement techniques had excellent intratester reliability, but for intertester reliability ICCs were 20% lower and LOA were 2.3 times higher than intratester values. Reliability estimates were similar between the digital level and the goniometer. However, because glenohumeral rotation was 3-5 degrees greater for the digital level than the goniometer (systematic error), the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. On the basis of the average intratester LOA for the goniometer and the digital level, a change of 6-11 degrees is needed to be certain that true change has occurred. For comparison of measures made by two different therapists, a change is of 15 degrees is required to be certain a true change has occurred. A digital level can be used to reliably measure shoulder ROM but should not be used interchangeably with a standard goniometer.
机译:用于联合测量的数字水平仪的临床使用可能是标准测角仪的可行替代方案。这项研究的目的是确定用于测量主动辅助肩关节活动范围(ROM)的标准通用测角仪与建筑级数字水平仪之间的内部和测试者可靠性。两名经验丰富的物理治疗师分别在两次不同的情况下,对20例单侧肩部病理的患者(男9例,女11例,年龄18-79岁)进行了双侧肩屈,外旋(ER)和内旋(IR)ROM测量,方法是测角仪和数字水准仪。相对可靠性通过使用类内相关系数(ICC)进行评估,绝对可靠性通过使用95%的协议限制(LOA)进行评估。使用测角计和数字水平仪进行测量时,Intratester ICC的范围为0.91至0.99,LOA的范围为3度至9度。测试器间的ICC范围为0.31至0.95,LOA范围为6度至25度。为了比较测角和数字级ROM,ICC的范围为0.71至0.98。数字水平的ER和IR ROM比测角计大3-5度(p <0.01)。测角与数字水平LOA的范围为6至11度,可用于屈膝。两种测量技术均具有出色的测试者内部可靠性,但对于测试者之间的可靠性,ICC比测试者内部值低20%,LOA则高2.3倍。数字水平仪和测角仪之间的可靠性估算值相似。但是,由于数字水平的盂肱旋转比测角计大3-5度(系统误差),因此这两种方法不能互换使用。根据测角仪的平均测试仪内部LOA和数字水平,需要确定6-11度的变化才能确定确实发生了变化。为了比较两个不同的治疗师所采取的措施,需要将角度改变15度,以确保发生了真正的改变。数字水平仪可用于可靠地测量肩背ROM,但不应与标准测角仪互换使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号