Expert Opinion on TCE Source Unpersuasive,Court Says,Citing Lack of Peer Review

Chemical Regulation Reporter Group

首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Regulation Reporter >Expert Opinion on TCE Source Unpersuasive,Court Says,Citing Lack of Peer Review

【24h】

Expert Opinion on TCE Source Unpersuasive,Court Says,Citing Lack of Peer Review

机译：法院认为，对传统文化表现形式来源缺乏说服力的专家意见

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Citing the absence of peer review or peer acceptance of the methodology,a federal district court April 20 disregarded an expert's testimony on the origin of a landfill's trichloroethylene contamination (Seneca Meadows Inc.v.ECI Liquidating Inc.,W.D.N.Y.,No.95-6400L,4/20/06).

机译：4月20日，联邦地方法院以缺乏同行评议或同行接受该方法为由，无视专家关于垃圾填埋场三氯乙烯污染源的证词（Seneca Meadows Inc.诉ECI Liquidating Inc.，WDNY，编号95-6400L ，4/20/06）。

著录项

来源
《Chemical Regulation Reporter》 |2006年第20期|共1页
作者
Chemical Regulation Reporter Group;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类生产安全技术;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-18 09:24:16

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Expert Opinion on TCE Source Unpersuasive,Court Says,Citing Lack of Peer Review [J] . Chemical Regulation Reporter Group Chemical Regulation Reporter . 2006,第20期

机译：法院认为，对传统文化表现形式来源缺乏说服力的专家意见
2. DOJ Cites Lack Of Standing To Fight Supreme Court Review Of CWA Findings [J] . David LaRoss Inside EPA's environmental policy alert . 2015,第13期

机译：司法部指出缺乏抗衡最高法院对CWA结果的审查的资格
3. Peer-Reviewed Forensic Consultation: Safeguarding Expert Testimony and Protecting the Uninformed Court [J] . Michael Welner MDa* Theresa Mastellon MAa Jada J. Stewart MAa Briana Weinert MAa, John M. B. Stratton MAa Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice . 2012,第1期

机译：同行评审的法医咨询：维护专家证词和保护不知情的法院
4. Predicting Low vs. High Disparity between Peer and Expert Ratings in Peer Reviews of Physics Lab Reports [C] . Huy V. Nguyen, Diane J. Litman International conference on artificial intelligence in education . 2013

机译：在物理实验室报告的同行评审中预测同行和专家评级之间的高低差异
5. An Examination of the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Review in Postsecondary Education Institutional Accreditation: Opinions from the Unheard Voice of Volunteer Peer Evaluators. [D] . Sanders, Jessica M. 2017

机译：在高等教育机构认证中同行评审的感知有效性的检验：来自志愿者同行评估员闻所未闻的观点。
6. Opinions given by medical experts in court are honest and objective. [O] . G. A. Norfolk 1997

机译：医学专家在法庭上发表的意见是诚实客观的。
7. Renal insufficiency and anemia are independent risk factors for death among patients with acute myocardial infarction1,21As published material, the contents of this manuscript may not be cited, quoted, reproduced or published without the consent of the authors.2The analyses upon which this publication is based were performed under Contract Number 500-96-P704, entitled “Operation Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization (PRO) for the State of Georgia” and sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services. The conclusions and opinions expressed, and methods used herein are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. The authors assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the ideas presented. This article is a direct result of the Health Care Quality Improvement Program initiated by CMS, which has encouraged identification of quality improvement projects derived from analysis of patterns of care, and therefore required no special funding on the part of this Contractor. Ideas and contributions to the authors concerning experience in engaging with issues presented are welcomed. [O] . Langston Robert D., Presley Rodney, Flanders W. Dana, 2003

机译：肾功能不全和贫血是急性心肌梗死患者死亡的独立危险因素1,21作为已发表的材料，未经作者的同意，不得引用，引用，复制或出版该手稿的内容。2本出版物所依据的分析这些工作是根据合同号500-96-P704进行的，该合同的标题为“佐治亚州的运营利用和质量控制同行评审组织（PRO）”，由卫生与人文部医疗保险和医疗补助中心（CMS）赞助服务。所表达的结论和意见以及本文使用的方法均为作者的结论和意见。它们不一定反映CMS政策。作者对所提出想法的准确性和完整性承担全部责任。本文是CMS发起的“医疗保健质量改善计划”的直接结果，该计划鼓励鉴定通过对护理模式进行分析而得出的质量改善项目，因此该承包商不需要任何特殊资金。欢迎作者提出解决问题的经验和想法。
8. Grants Peer Review: Opinions on the NIH Grants Peer Review System. Report to the Director, NIH. Phase II [R] . 1978

机译：授予同行评审：关于NIH资助同行评审系统的意见。向NIH主任报告。第二阶段

Expert Opinion on TCE Source Unpersuasive,Court Says,Citing Lack of Peer Review

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅