...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Engineering Science >Evaluation of pseudohomogeneous models for heat transfer in packed beds with gas flow and gas-liquid cocurrent downflow and upflow
【24h】

Evaluation of pseudohomogeneous models for heat transfer in packed beds with gas flow and gas-liquid cocurrent downflow and upflow

机译:气流与气液并流上下流动的填充床传热假均质模型评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Several pseudohomogeneous models are used by researchers in the study of heat transfer in packed beds. In this work, five of the most used pseudohomogeneous models (to one, two and three parameters) are analyzed, for gas and gas-liquid flow configurations'. The models were evaluated concerning the following aspects: (a) the fitting between calculated and measured temperatures, (b) the values of thermal parameters, (c) their confidence intervals, (d) the quality of the estimation of the thermal parameters by analysis of their Box biases, and (c) the nonlinear dependence of the calculated temperatures on the thermal parameters (using the curvature measures of Bates and Watts). It was observed, particularly in gas-liquid flow, that the fittings between calculated and measured temperature profiles are better for models in which a wall heat transfer coefficient is incorporated to consider the convective resistance at the bed wall. It was also noted that the values of the thermal parameters fitted from the pseudohomogeneous models may be very different at identical operational conditions. The effective axial thermal conductivity may be neglected in the modeling because its estimation does not affect the residual functions. Besides, the estimation of k(a) is tricky because it depends on the initial guess and also because the parameter is extremely sensitive to changes in the operational conditions. The confidence intervals for the parameters depend on the model and are also affected by the experimental conditions. The estimation of the parameters was adequate for the k(r)-h(W) and k(r)-k(a) models and the curvatures measures were satisfactory only for models in which h(W) was not incorporated. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:研究人员在填充床传热研究中使用了几种伪均质模型。在这项工作中,分析了五个最常用的伪均质模型(分别针对一个,两个和三个参数),用于气体和气液流动配置。对模型进行了以下方面的评估:(a)计算温度与测量温度之间的拟合度;(b)热参数值;(c)置信区间;(d)通过分析估算热参数的质量(x)计算温度对热参数的非线性依赖性(使用贝茨和瓦特的曲率度量)。观察到,特别是在气-液流动中,对于结合了壁传热系数来考虑床壁对流阻力的模型,计算和测得的温度曲线之间的拟合更好。还应注意,在相同的操作条件下,从伪均质模型拟合的热参数值可能会非常不同。在模型中可以忽略有效的轴向导热系数,因为它的估计不会影响残差函数。此外,k(a)的估计很棘手,因为它取决于初始猜测,并且还因为参数对操作条件的变化非常敏感。参数的置信区间取决于模型,并且还受实验条件的影响。参数的估计对于k(r)-h(W)和k(r)-k(a)模型是足够的,并且曲率测度仅对于未包含h(W)的模型是令人满意的。 (c)2005 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号