首页> 外文期刊>Plant disease management reports PDMR >Evaluation of DMI fungicides for management of apple scab in a DMI-resistant ‘Empire’ orchard, 2006
【24h】

Evaluation of DMI fungicides for management of apple scab in a DMI-resistant ‘Empire’ orchard, 2006

机译:对DMI抗性“帝国”果园中管理苹果​​黑星病的DMI杀菌剂的评估,2006年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Trials were conducted in a 11-year-old orchard of trees in Geneva, NY. Each test plot contained one ‘Empire’ (M.9 rootstock) and one ‘Jonagold’ (M.9/M.111 interstem rootstock) tree. Treatments were arranged in a randomized completeblock design with four replications. All treatments were applied dilute to drip using a high-pressure handgun (300gal/acre). Cover sprays were applied with an airblast sprayer at 3X concentration. Ascospore release was monitored from 5 Apr through 20 Maywith a Burkard spore trap. Ascospore counts were assessed in hourly increments during periods of rain andwere combined for the infection events summarized in Table 1. The ascospore dose in the orchard was moderate due to commercially acceptable scab control in 2005. With eight infection periods, disease pressure in 2006 was high. The pathogenpopulation in the test orchard reflected the status of practical resistance to commercially available DMI fungicides. Emphasis was placed on the post-infection performances of the commercial DMI Nova (myclobutanil) in comparison to the experimental DMIsTopguard (flutriafol) and Enable (fenbuconazole). The protective fungicide Dithane alone applied at the low label rate or mixed with Captan served as comparative controls in the post-infection trials. The scab program was initiated with a post-infectionapplication in response to the severe infection period on 22-24 Apr accompanied by the mostmassive discharge of ascospores (Table 1). Scab incidences recorded on 12 Jun reflected the control provided by all five treatments of the trial program (Table 2).
机译:试验是在纽约州日内瓦的一个11岁的果园里进行的。每个测试样区都包含一棵“帝国”(M.9砧木)和一棵“乔纳金德”(M.9 / M.111间生砧木)树。以随机重复的完整区组设计安排治疗,重复四次。使用高压手枪(300加仑/英亩)将所有处理物稀释后滴入。用气喷式喷雾器以3X的浓度施加覆盖喷雾。从4月5日至5月20日使用Burkard孢子阱监测子囊孢子的释放。表1总结了雨天的子囊孢子计数(按小时递增),并合并了感染事件。表1列出了果园的子囊孢子剂量适中,这是由于2005年商业上可接受的sc病控制。在八个感染期中,2006年的疾病压力很高。试验果园中的病原菌种群反映了对市售DMI杀菌剂的实际抗性状况。与实验性DMIsTopguard(氟替莫非)和Enable(芬布康唑)相比,重点在于商业DMI Nova(myclobutanil)的感染后性能。在感染后试验中,单独以低标记率施用保护性杀菌剂二硫烷或与Captan混合使用作为对照。为了应对4月22日至24日的严重感染期并伴有最大量的子囊孢子排放,应在感染后开始实施ab疮程序(表1)。 6月12日记录的疮发病率反映了该试验计划的所有5种治疗方法所提供的控制(表2)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号